| 注册
首页|期刊导航|青岛大学医学院学报|原发性青光眼标准白-白视野和脉冲视野检查对比

原发性青光眼标准白-白视野和脉冲视野检查对比

李芹 王大博 韩静 丁建峰

青岛大学医学院学报2017,Vol.53Issue(4):424-426,430,4.
青岛大学医学院学报2017,Vol.53Issue(4):424-426,430,4.DOI:10.13361/j.qdyxy.201704015

原发性青光眼标准白-白视野和脉冲视野检查对比

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF WHITE-ON-WHITE PERIMETRY AND PULSAR PERIMETRY IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY GLAUCOMA

李芹 1王大博 1韩静 1丁建峰1

作者信息

  • 1. 青岛大学附属医院眼科,山东青岛266003
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To investigate the differences in visual field indices and test time between white-on-white perimetry and pulsar perimetry in patients with primary glaucoma.Methods A total of 36 patients (44 eyes) with primary glaucoma and visual field defect who were diagnosed in our hospital were enrolled and underwent white-on-white perimetry and pulsar perimetry at an interval of 30 min.The differences in mean defect (MD),square root of loss variance (sLV),and test time were analyzed.Results Pulsar perimetry had significantly lower MD and sLV and a significantly shorter test time than white-on-white perimetry (t=13.585-16.245,P<0.05).Conclusion There are significant differences in visual field indices and test time between white-on-white perimetry and pulsar perimetry in patients with primary glaucoma,and pulsar perimetry has a shorter test time than white-on-white perimetry.

关键词

视野测试/对比研究/青光眼

Key words

visual field tests/comparative study/glaucoma

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

李芹,王大博,韩静,丁建峰..原发性青光眼标准白-白视野和脉冲视野检查对比[J].青岛大学医学院学报,2017,53(4):424-426,430,4.

青岛大学医学院学报

OACSTPCD

1672-4488

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文