| 注册
首页|期刊导航|解放军医学院学报|一次性可扩张通道辅助下微创经椎间孔融合术与开放手术治疗巨大腰椎间盘突出症的疗效比较

一次性可扩张通道辅助下微创经椎间孔融合术与开放手术治疗巨大腰椎间盘突出症的疗效比较

姜威 毛克亚 钟睿 王旭翾 李修璨

解放军医学院学报2017,Vol.38Issue(9):815-819,5.
解放军医学院学报2017,Vol.38Issue(9):815-819,5.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2017.09.003

一次性可扩张通道辅助下微创经椎间孔融合术与开放手术治疗巨大腰椎间盘突出症的疗效比较

Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal interbody lumbar fusion assisted by disposable dilating tube versus open surgery for massive lumbar disc herniation

姜威 1毛克亚 1钟睿 1王旭翾 1李修璨1

作者信息

  • 1. 解放军总医院,北京100853
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion (MIS-TLIF) and open surgery for massive lumbar disc herniation and evaluate the safety and effectiveness of MIS-TLIF.Methods Clinical data about 59 patients who suffered from single-level massive lumbar disc herniation were investigated from August 2012 to June 2014.Twentyeight cases underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) while 31 cases underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion (MIS-TLIF) assisted by disposable dilating tube.The perioperative characteristics were compared between the two groups.Back and leg pain Visual Analogue Scores (VAS),Oswestry Disable Index (ODI) and radiological examination were performed preoperatively,postoperatively,and during follow-up.Results All patients underwent successful operation and have been followed up for more than 2 years.There was no significant difference in demographic data,preoperative VAS and ODI scores,and operative time between two groups (P > 0.05).There were less operative blood loss and post-operative drainage in MIS-TLIF group than PLIF group [(121 ± 57.8) ml vs (256 ± 176.3) ml,P < 0.01;0 ml vs (293 ± 187.2) ml,P < 0.01].The patients of MIS-TLIF group had shorter postoperative time in bed and hospitalization time than PLIF group [(1.6-± 0.5) d vs (3.2 ± 1.1) d,P < 0.01;(4.4 ± 1.2) d vs (8.1 ± 3.8) d,P < 0.01].During the follow-up period,the VAS and ODI scores improved significantly compared with preoperative data in both groups (P < 0.05),while there was no significant difference between two groups at 3,6 and 12 months postoperatively.Conclusion MIS-TLIF and PLIF can achieve similar clinical outcomes for massive lumbar disc herniation,but as for the perioperative blood loss,postoperative in-bed time,postoperative back pain,MIS-TLIF is superior to PLIF.

关键词

巨大腰椎间盘突出/微创手术/一次性可扩张通道

Key words

massive lumbar disc herniation/minimally invasive/disposable dilating tube

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

姜威,毛克亚,钟睿,王旭翾,李修璨..一次性可扩张通道辅助下微创经椎间孔融合术与开放手术治疗巨大腰椎间盘突出症的疗效比较[J].解放军医学院学报,2017,38(9):815-819,5.

基金项目

北京市科技计划(Z161100001516013)Supported by the Beijing Science and Technology Program (Z161100001516013) (Z161100001516013)

解放军医学院学报

OACSTPCD

2095-5227

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文