解放军医学院学报2017，Vol.38Issue(9)：827-830,4.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2017.09.006
机器人辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗腹膜后副神经节瘤疗效比较
Effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic versus traditional laparoscopic surgery for treatment of retroperitoneal paragangliomas
任省身 1马鑫 1符伟军 1王保军 1张旭1
作者信息
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) and traditional laparoscopic surgery (TLS) in the treatment of retroperitoneal paragangliomas (PGL) and evaluate the safety and feasibility of RALS.Methods This retrospective study recruited 23 patients who underwent surgery in our hospital from January 2009 to January 2016,including 6 cases treated by RALS and the other 17 cases treated by TLS.The perioperative and follow-up data of all patients were recorded and analyzed statistically.Results Compared with TLS,RALS indicated a significant superiority with less blood loss [125.0(152.5) ml vs 250.0(225.0) ml,P=0.045] and less fluctuation of intraoperative blood pressure [(56.7 ± 15.0) mmHg vs (91.8 ± 34.5) mmHg,P=0.011].No statistical difference was found in operative time,utilization of Esmolol,blood transfusion,postoperative complications,time to oral-intake,time to off-bed activity,length of catheter-indwelling and hospital stay.One patient undergoing TLS recurred in postoperative follow-up,while no recurrence was found after RALS.Conclusion RALS is a safe and effective micro-invasive operation for retroperitoneal PGL.Large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to testify our conclusion.关键词
机器人辅助腹腔镜手术/传统腹腔镜手术/腹膜后副神经节瘤Key words
robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery/traditional laparoscopic surgery/retroperitoneal paragangliomas分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
任省身,马鑫,符伟军,王保军,张旭..机器人辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗腹膜后副神经节瘤疗效比较[J].解放军医学院学报,2017,38(9):827-830,4.
