| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国实用外科杂志|颈动脉狭窄规范化治疗争议与共识

颈动脉狭窄规范化治疗争议与共识

唐骁 郭大乔 符伟国

中国实用外科杂志2017,Vol.37Issue(12):1334-1339,6.
中国实用外科杂志2017,Vol.37Issue(12):1334-1339,6.DOI:10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2017.12.06

颈动脉狭窄规范化治疗争议与共识

Evidence based treatment for carotid artery stenosis:Controversy and consensus

唐骁 1郭大乔 1符伟国1

作者信息

  • 1. 复旦大学附属中山医院血管外科复旦大学血管外科研究所,上海200032
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Carotid artery stenosis is a well-recognized risk factor for ischemic stroke.In the late 1980s and in the 1990s,well-designed randomized trials established a definite advantage for carotid endarterectomy.Although those landmark trials have helped to establish the current guidelines,there still remains a great deal of controversy regarding the technical approach to carotid revascularization.In particular,current medical treatment has drastically decreased the risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.Selecting patients amenable to endovascular or surgical treatment still needs to be resolved.

关键词

颈动脉狭窄/规范化治疗

Key words

carotid artery stenosis/evidence based treatment

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

唐骁,郭大乔,符伟国..颈动脉狭窄规范化治疗争议与共识[J].中国实用外科杂志,2017,37(12):1334-1339,6.

基金项目

上海市科委基金(No.14411962300) (No.14411962300)

中国实用外科杂志

OA北大核心CSCDCSTPCD

1005-2208

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文