| 注册
首页|期刊导航|国际医药卫生导报|软通道与硬通道微创穿刺引流术于高血压脑出血患者中应用效果对比

软通道与硬通道微创穿刺引流术于高血压脑出血患者中应用效果对比

张红星

国际医药卫生导报2018,Vol.24Issue(4):500-503,4.
国际医药卫生导报2018,Vol.24Issue(4):500-503,4.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2018.04.013

软通道与硬通道微创穿刺引流术于高血压脑出血患者中应用效果对比

Soft-versus hard-channel minimally invasive puncture drainages for patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage

张红星1

作者信息

  • 1. 454550 沁阳市人民医院神经外科
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To explore the effects of soft-versus hard-channel minimally invasive puncture drainages for patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH).Methods 76 patients with HICH treated at our hospital from March,2016 to February,2017 were randomly divided into an observation group (n=38) and a control group (n=38).The observation group were given hard-channel minimally invasive puncture drainage while control group soft-channel minimally invasive puncture drainage.The curative effect,hematoma clearance,complications,and activity of daily living (ADL) of the two groups were observed.Results Compared with the control group,the effective rate and hematoma clearance rate of observation group were higher.The incidence of complications was higher in control group than in the observation group (P<0.05).Before surgery,there was no statistical difference in the ADL score between the two groups (P>0.05);after surgery,the ADL score was lower in the control group than in the observation group (P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with soft-channel minimally invasive puncture drainage,hard-channel minimally invasive puncture drainage can increase the hematoma clearance rate,promote the recovery of nerve function,and improve prognosis.

关键词

高血压脑出血/软通道微创穿刺引流术/硬通道微创穿刺引流术/临床疗效/并发症

Key words

Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage/Soft-channel minimally invasive puncture drainage/Hard-channel minimally invasive puncture drainage/Clinical efficacy/Complications

引用本文复制引用

张红星..软通道与硬通道微创穿刺引流术于高血压脑出血患者中应用效果对比[J].国际医药卫生导报,2018,24(4):500-503,4.

国际医药卫生导报

1007-1245

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文