| 注册
首页|期刊导航|海洋测绘|不同类型DDM相互应用的质量分析

不同类型DDM相互应用的质量分析

曹鸿博 张立华 张梅彩 夏雷

海洋测绘2017,Vol.37Issue(5):64-67,4.
海洋测绘2017,Vol.37Issue(5):64-67,4.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3044.2017.05.014

不同类型DDM相互应用的质量分析

A Quality Analysis of Exchanged Applications of Different Types of Digital Depth Models

曹鸿博 1张立华 2张梅彩 3夏雷1

作者信息

  • 1. 海军大连舰艇学院海洋测绘系,辽宁大连116018
  • 2. 海军大连舰艇学院海洋测绘工程军队重点实验室,辽宁大连116018
  • 3. 海军出版社,天津300450
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Digital Depth Model (DDM) is usually used either for navigation or for non-navigation.DDMs for navigation and non-navigation are respectively constructed based on their different requirements.The qualities,which are expressed when different types of DDMs are exchanged (DDM for navigation applied to non-navigation or DDM for non-navigation applied to navigation),are compared and analyzed.The experimental results demonstrate:the mean square error of DDM for navigation is larger than that of DDM for non-navigation,and a systematic offset is generated along shallow direction in DDM for navigation.The accuracy of DDM for navigation is lowered when applied to non-navigation,and the lowered degree becomes larger with a smaller scale.DDMs for non-navigation,without considering navigation safety,make the probability of an adequate depth obviously low,and it becomes lower with a smaller scale.Thus,DDM for non-navigation cannot be directly applied to navigation.

关键词

海洋测绘/数字水深模型/中误差/整体偏差值/深度保证率/深度表达度

Key words

hydrographic surveying and charting/digital depth model/mean square error/the whole offset/probability of an adequate depth/representativeness of depth

分类

天文与地球科学

引用本文复制引用

曹鸿博,张立华,张梅彩,夏雷..不同类型DDM相互应用的质量分析[J].海洋测绘,2017,37(5):64-67,4.

基金项目

国家自然科学基金(41471380). (41471380)

海洋测绘

OACSCDCSTPCD

1671-3044

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文