| 注册
首页|期刊导航|南京医科大学学报(自然科学版)|宫颈癌术后静态调强放疗与容积旋转调强放疗的比较

宫颈癌术后静态调强放疗与容积旋转调强放疗的比较

朱必清 武雅琴 韩晶晶 李倩 徐寒子 陆谔梅

南京医科大学学报(自然科学版)2018,Vol.38Issue(1):88-91,98,5.
南京医科大学学报(自然科学版)2018,Vol.38Issue(1):88-91,98,5.DOI:10.7655/NYDXBNS20180120

宫颈癌术后静态调强放疗与容积旋转调强放疗的比较

Comparison of IMRT and VMAT strategies for postoperative cervical cancer patients

朱必清 1武雅琴 1韩晶晶 1李倩 1徐寒子 1陆谔梅1

作者信息

  • 1. 南京医科大学附属肿瘤医院(江苏省肿瘤医院)放疗科,江苏省肿瘤防治研究所,江苏南京210009
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective:The primary aim of this study was to compare the incidence of acute adverse reactions and dosimetric parameters of postoperative cervical cancer patients with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and to provide the reasonable selection of the cervical cancer patients who had needed postoperative radiotherapy.Methods:In our study, a total of 100 cervical cancer patients who needed postoperative radiotherapy were respectively treated with IMRT or VMAT, including 50 patients in the IMRT group and 50 patients in the VMAT group.The acute radioactive adverse reactions,dose of organ at risk (OAR), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), the number of monitor units (MUs) and treatment times were compared between the two groups.Results:The incidence of acute radioactive enteritis in the VMAT group was obviously lower than the IMRT group (38% vs.64%, P < 0.05).Compared with the IMRT group, the incidence of upper gastrointestinal tract reaction significantly decreased in the VMAT group (20% vs.6%, P < 0.05).The small intestine V40 and rectum V40 of the VMAT group was markedly lower than those of the IMRT group (P < 0.01).However, rectum and small intestine V20 and V30, as well as bladder V20,V30, and V40 showed no statistical difference between the two groups (P > 0.05).Compared with the IMRT group, the CI of VMAT group was significantly improved (P < 0.05), while there were no statistical differences of the HI between the two techniques (P >0.05).The MUs and treatment times of the VMAT group compared with those of the IMRT group were significantly decreased by 50% and 54%, respectively (P < 0.01).Conclusion:VMAT is superior to IMRT in many aspects.Cervical cancer postoperative patients choose VMAT treatment could reduce the acute radioactive adverse reactions, decrease the dose of OAR, and shorten the treatment time of radiotherapy to improve the tolerance of patients with postoperative radiotherapy.

关键词

宫颈癌术后/放射治疗/静态调强放疗/容积旋转调强放疗

Key words

postoperative cervical cancer patients/radiotherapy/IMRT/VMAT

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

朱必清,武雅琴,韩晶晶,李倩,徐寒子,陆谔梅..宫颈癌术后静态调强放疗与容积旋转调强放疗的比较[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2018,38(1):88-91,98,5.

基金项目

江苏省妇幼健康科研项目(F201762) (F201762)

南京医科大学学报(自然科学版)

OA北大核心CSCDCSTPCD

1007-4368

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文