| 注册
首页|期刊导航|临床肝胆病杂志|加速康复外科与传统康复方案在肝切除术中应用比较的Meta分析

加速康复外科与传统康复方案在肝切除术中应用比较的Meta分析

李乐 陈金明 刘中华 李强 史赢

临床肝胆病杂志2018,Vol.34Issue(2):303-308,6.
临床肝胆病杂志2018,Vol.34Issue(2):303-308,6.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2018.02.017

加速康复外科与传统康复方案在肝切除术中应用比较的Meta分析

Application of enhanced recovery after surgery versus traditional rehabilitation program in hepatectomy: a Meta-analysis

李乐 1陈金明 1刘中华 1李强 1史赢1

作者信息

  • 1. 内蒙古赤峰市医院肝胆外科,内蒙古赤峰024000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) versus traditional rehabilitation program in patients undergoing hepatectomy.Methods PubMed,EBSCO,MEDLINE,and Cochrane Library were searched for the articles on the effect of ERAS versus traditional rehabilitation program in liver surgery published up to August 2016.Two independent observers performed quality assessment and data extraction according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,and RevMan 5.3.5 was used for the Meta-analysis.Results A total of 4 articles with 524 patients (254 patients in ERAS group and 270 in traditional treatment group) were included.Compared with the traditional treatment group,the ERAS group had significantly shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] =-2.72,95% confidence interval [C I]:-3.86 to-1.57,P < 0.000 01),shorter time to functional recovery (WMD =-2.67,95% CI:-3.68 to-1.65,P < 0.000 01),and lower overall incidence rate of complications (odds ratio [OR] =0.45,95% CI:0.30 -0.67,P <0.000 1).The subgroup analysis showed that the ERAS group also had significantly lower incidence rates of grade 1 and grade 2-5 complications than the traditional treatment group (grade 1:OR =0.55,95% CI:0.31-0.98,P < 0.05;grade 2-5:OR =0.49,95% CI:0.32 0.76,P < 0.05).There was no significant difference in rehospitalization rate between the two groups (P > 0.05).As for the level of C-reactive protein,there was no significant difference between the two groups at 1 and 3 days after surgery (P > 0.05),but the ERAS group had a significantly lower level than the traditional treatment group at 5 days after surgery (WMD =-21.68,95% CI:-29.30 to-14.05,P < 0.000 1).The ERAS group also had a significantly shorter time to first flatus than the traditional treatment group (WMD =-0.93,95% CI:-1.41 to-0.46,P=0.000 1).Conclusion ERAS is safe,effective,and feasible in liver surgery.

关键词

肝肿瘤/肝切除术/加速康复外科/Meta分析

Key words

liver neoplasms/hepatectomy/enhanced recovery after surgery/Meta-analysis

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

李乐,陈金明,刘中华,李强,史赢..加速康复外科与传统康复方案在肝切除术中应用比较的Meta分析[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2018,34(2):303-308,6.

临床肝胆病杂志

OA北大核心CSTPCD

1001-5256

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文