| 注册
首页|期刊导航|护理研究|2014年-2016年中国临床护理实践指南的质量评价

2014年-2016年中国临床护理实践指南的质量评价

王云云 靳英辉 梅晓凤 赵雪 王利 曹虹

护理研究2018,Vol.32Issue(5):665-673,9.
护理研究2018,Vol.32Issue(5):665-673,9.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2018.05.001

2014年-2016年中国临床护理实践指南的质量评价

Quality Evaluation of Clinical Nursing Practice Guidelines in China from 2014 to 2016

王云云 1靳英辉 2梅晓凤 3赵雪 3王利 3曹虹4

作者信息

  • 1. 300193,天津中医药大学
  • 2. 300193,天津中医药大学循证护理中心,天津中医药大学护理学院
  • 3. 300193,天津中医药大学研究生院
  • 4. 300211,天津市天津医院
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate the quality of Nursing Practice Guidelines in China from 2014 to 2016 and compare them with previ-ous guidelines.Methods:Clinical nursing practice guidelines published in academic journals were screened and retrieved from four Chi-nese journal databases:CNKI,Wanfang,VIP,and CBM during the period of January 2014 to December 2016.The quality of guidelines included were evaluated by AGREE Ⅱ Instrument,created by AGREE Collaboration(Appraisal of Guidelines,Research and Evalua-tion).Results:A total of 50 guidelines were included.The scores of 6 domains of AGREE Ⅱ were:29.17%(23.61%,36.11%)on scope and purpose,0.00(0.00,0.00)on stakeholder involvement,5.73%(3.65%,7.29%)on rigour of development,50.00%(38.89%, 55.56%)on clarity of presentation,5.73%(3.13%,11.20%)on applicability,and 0.00(0.00,0.00)on editorial independence. There was a statistically significant difference between the evidence-based guidelines(EB-NPG)and the consensus based guidelines (CB-NPG)in six domains(P<0.05).Compared the results of this study with that of 1997 to 2013,the scores of the other five do-mains had statistically significant difference(P<0.01)in despite of the domain of editorial independence.Conclusions:The quality of clinical nursing practice guidelines in China from 2014 to 2016 was relatively lower,and compared with the clinical nursing practice guideline from 1997 to 2013,the only improved domain was the rigour of development.The guideline developers should focus on the study of methodology and standardize their reporting standards.

关键词

指南/临床护理实践指南/循证医学/AGREEⅡ/质量评价/指南评价

Key words

guidelines/nursing practice guidelines/evidence-based medicine/AGREE Ⅱ/quality evaluation/guidelines evaluation

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

王云云,靳英辉,梅晓凤,赵雪,王利,曹虹..2014年-2016年中国临床护理实践指南的质量评价[J].护理研究,2018,32(5):665-673,9.

基金项目

国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目——中西医调摄护理多源证据体构建及整合评价,批准号:81603496. ()

护理研究

OA北大核心CSTPCD

1009-6493

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文