经微创跗骨窦切口入路与传统外侧L形切口入路比较治疗跟骨骨折的Meta分析OACSTPCD
Minimally invasive sinus tarsal approach versus conventional L-shaped lateral approach in treating calcaneal fractures: a Meta-analysis
目的:比较微创跗骨窦切口入路(minimally invasive sinus tarsal appproach,MISTA)与传统外侧L形切口入路(conventional L-shaped lateral approach,CLSLA)两种术式治疗跟骨骨折的安全性和疗效.方法:计算机检索PubMed、CENTRAL、EMbase、ISI Web of Knowledge Databases、VIP、CNKI、CBM和万方数据库,查找所有比较M…查看全部>>
Objective:To compare efficacy and safety of minimally invasive sinus tarsal approach versus conventional L-shaped lateral approach in treating calcaneal fractures.Methods:The studies concerning about randomized controlled trial and non-randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive sinus tarsal approach versus conventional L-shaped lateral approach in treating calcaneal fractures from the time of creating database to March,2017 were searched from PubMed,C…查看全部>>
吴旻昊;孙文超;闫飞飞;侯志强;冯帆;蔡林
武汉大学中南医院骨四科,湖北武汉430071武汉大学中南医院骨四科,湖北武汉430071武汉大学中南医院骨四科,湖北武汉430071武汉大学中南医院骨四科,湖北武汉430071武汉大学中南医院骨四科,湖北武汉430071武汉大学中南医院骨四科,湖北武汉430071
跟骨骨折Meta分析
CalcaneusFracturesMeta-analysis
《中国骨伤》 2017 (12)
1118-1126,9
评论