| 注册
首页|期刊导航|国际眼科杂志|PachPen超声角膜测厚仪与两种光学测量仪器在中央角膜厚度测量中的对比

PachPen超声角膜测厚仪与两种光学测量仪器在中央角膜厚度测量中的对比

周欢明 贾元玲 项敏泓 李青松 田文杰 高翔

国际眼科杂志2018,Vol.18Issue(4):709-712,4.
国际眼科杂志2018,Vol.18Issue(4):709-712,4.DOI:10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2018.4.29

PachPen超声角膜测厚仪与两种光学测量仪器在中央角膜厚度测量中的对比

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by PachPen ultrasonic pachymetry and the other two optical measuring instruments

周欢明 1贾元玲 1项敏泓 1李青松 1田文杰 1高翔1

作者信息

  • 1. 200062 中国上海市,上海中医药大学附属普陀医院眼科
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

·AIM:To compare the similarities and differences of central corneal thickness (CCT) measured by different devices, so as to provide a safe, effective, simple and accurate method for measuring corneal thickness. ·METHODS: Totally 95 eyes of 95 cataract patients enrolled continuously for preoperative examination in ophthalmology department of Putuo Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from September 2016 to December 2016. Handheld automatic PachPen ultrasonic pachymetry (USP), anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and specular microscopy were respectively used to measure the central corneal thickness,and intraocular pressure was measured at the same time. The similarities and differences of these three different devices to measure the central corneal thickness and their correlations with intraocular pressure were observed. Then the data were analyzed statistically. · RESULTS: The CCT value measured by PachPen ultrasonic pachymetry was 544. 43 ± 36. 61μ m, the CCT value measured by AS-OCT was 527.09 ± 35.54μ m, and the CCT value measured by specular microscopy was 533.20 ± 30. 17μ m. There was significant difference between these three groups(F=6.272,P=0.002),and the CCT value measured by PachPen ultrasonic pachymetry was significantly higher than the other two groups. The correlation coefficients between the CCT values of these three groups and intraocular pressure were 0.290, 0.277 and 0.204 (P<0.05) respectively, of which the correlation between the CCT measured by PachPen ultrasonic pachymetry and the intraocular pressure was the highest. There was statistically significant correlation between the CCT values measured by these three measurements (P<0.001). ·CONCLUSION: The CCT value measured by PachPen ultrasonic pachymetry is the highest. The second CCT value is measured by specular microscopy, and the smallest CCT value is measured by AS-OCT. Obvious correlation and good consistency were found in the CCT values measured by three types of devices, and the CCT values were all correlated with intraocular pressure. Therefore,we should take more attention in clinic.

关键词

中央角膜厚度/PachPen超声角膜测厚仪/眼前节光学相干断层扫描/角膜内皮镜/相关性

Key words

central corneal thickness/PachPen ultrasonic pachymetry/anterior segment optical coherence tomography/specular microscopy/correlation

引用本文复制引用

周欢明,贾元玲,项敏泓,李青松,田文杰,高翔..PachPen超声角膜测厚仪与两种光学测量仪器在中央角膜厚度测量中的对比[J].国际眼科杂志,2018,18(4):709-712,4.

基金项目

上海市普陀区自主创新科研基金(No.2013PTKW009) (No.2013PTKW009)

上海中医药大学预算内项目(No.2015YSN50) (No.2015YSN50)

上海市综合医院中西医结合专项(No.ZHYY-ZXYJHZX-2-16) Putuo District of Shanghai Independent Innovation Research Foundation(No.2013PTKW009) (No.ZHYY-ZXYJHZX-2-16)

Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Budget Project(No.2015YSN50) (No.2015YSN50)

Shanghai General Hospital Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Foundation(No.ZHYY-ZXYJHZX-2-16) (No.ZHYY-ZXYJHZX-2-16)

国际眼科杂志

OA北大核心CSTPCD

1672-5123

访问量4
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文