西南国防医药2018，Vol.28Issue(3)：201-204,4.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-0188.2018.03.001
4种不同方法提取苍术挥发油的比较研究
Comparative analysis on four different methods for extracting volatile oil from Atractylodes Lances
摘要
Abstract
Objective To optimize the methods for extracting volatile oil from Atractylodes Lancea.Methods The volatile oil from Atractylodes Lancea was separately extracted with the steam distillation method,direct distillation method,ultrasound-assisted ionic liquid extraction method and the subcritical water extraction method.The yields were calculated accordingly.The GC-MS method together with manual search was adopted to analyze the chemical composition of the extracted volatile oil.Results The yields of volatile oil from Atractylodes Lancea with the steam distillation method,direct distillation method and ultrasound-assisted ionic liquid extraction method were respectively 1.19％,1.05％ and 1.90％.The oil was not successfully extracted with the subcritical water extraction method.There were totally 46 peaks on the GC-MS chromatogram,from which 30 compounds were identified.The peak area of identified components accounted for over 81％ the total outflow peak area,mostly olefin compounds.Conclusion The ultrasound-assisted ionic liquid extraction method has a higher efficiency of extracting volatile oil from Atractylodes Lancea than the steam distillation method and the direct distillation method.The subcritical water extraction method does not apply to the extraction of volatile oil from Atractylodes Lancea.关键词
苍术/挥发油/离子液体/亚临界水/GC-MSKey words
Atractylodes Lancea/volatile oil/ionic liquid/subcritical water/GC-MS分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
张翼,张硕,谭永红,袁吕江,于波涛..4种不同方法提取苍术挥发油的比较研究[J].西南国防医药,2018,28(3):201-204,4.基金项目
四川省科技支撑计划项目(2014SZ0141) （2014SZ0141）
重庆市科委社会事业与民生保障科技创新专项,cstc2017shmsA10004 （）
