| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国中西医结合外科杂志|胸腔镜与开胸手术治疗胸部创伤疗效比较的Meta分析

胸腔镜与开胸手术治疗胸部创伤疗效比较的Meta分析

徐磊 苗晓慧

中国中西医结合外科杂志2018,Vol.24Issue(2):189-196,8.
中国中西医结合外科杂志2018,Vol.24Issue(2):189-196,8.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-6948.2018.02.015

胸腔镜与开胸手术治疗胸部创伤疗效比较的Meta分析

Comparison on Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Open Thoracotomy for Treatment of Thoracic Trauma: A Meta-analysis

徐磊 1苗晓慧1

作者信息

  • 1. 天津市海河医院胸外科 天津 300350
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effect of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with open thoracotomy for treatment of thoracic trauma. Methods Literature search was conducted in Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP and WanFang database. Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 27 studies with 2210 patients were included. The mortality rate between thoracoscopic surgery group and open thoracotomy group was not significantly different (RR=0.82 (95%CI:0.24–2.79, P=0.75). The incidence of postoperative complications (RR=0.47 (95%CI: 0.33–0.65), P<0.001), amount of bleeding [MD= –100.39 mL (95%CI: –103.06 to –97.72), P<0.001], operation time [MD= –15.56 min (95%CI: –16.60 to –14.56), P<0.001], tube drainage volume [MD= –150.19 mL (95%CI: –188.71 to–111.67), P<0.001], duration of tube drainage [MD= –1.64 d (95%CI: –1.75 to –1.52), P<0.001] and duration of hospitalization [MD= –4.61 d (95%CI: –5.23 to –3.99), P<0.001] of patients in the thoracoscopic surgery group were significantly reduced compared with those in open thoracotomy group. Conclusion Thoracoscopic surgery is a safe and effective treatment for thoracic trauma.

关键词

胸腔镜/胸部创伤/开胸手术/Meta分析

Key words

Thoracoscopic surgery/thoracic trauma/open thoracotomy/Meta-analysis

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

徐磊,苗晓慧..胸腔镜与开胸手术治疗胸部创伤疗效比较的Meta分析[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2018,24(2):189-196,8.

中国中西医结合外科杂志

OACSTPCD

1007-6948

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文