| 注册
首页|期刊导航|西南国防医药|两种术式治疗区域型肝内胆管结石的临床疗效比较研究

两种术式治疗区域型肝内胆管结石的临床疗效比较研究

徐平 曹卫

西南国防医药2018,Vol.28Issue(4):313-315,3.
西南国防医药2018,Vol.28Issue(4):313-315,3.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-0188.2018.04.005

两种术式治疗区域型肝内胆管结石的临床疗效比较研究

Comparison of clinical effects of two surgical treatments for regional hepatolithiasis

徐平 1曹卫1

作者信息

  • 1. 435005湖北黄石,黄石人福医院外一科
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effects of two surgical treatments (laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and partial hepatectomy) for regional hepatolithiasis.Methods A total of 104 patients with regional hepatolithiasis admitted into our hospital were selected as the subjects for the research and were divided into a LCBDE group (n=50) and a partial hepatectomy group (n =54).The clinical effect,incidence of postoperative complications,calculus residual rate and three-year calculus recurrence rate were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate of treatment of the partial hepatectomy group was 94.44%,significantly higher than that of the LCBDE group (82.00%) (P < 0.05);the complication probability of the partial hepatectomy group was 27.78%,significantly higher than that of the LCBDE group (12.00%)(P < 0.05);the calculus residual rate and three-year calculus recurrence rate of the partial hepatectomy group were 7.41% and 5.56% respectively,significantly lower than those of the LCBDE group (28.00% and 22.00%)(P < 0.05).Conclusion As for regional hepatolithiasis,partial hepatectomy can reduce the postoperative calculus residual rate.Despite a higher complication probability,the clinical effect and long-term effect are superior to the LCBDE procedure.

关键词

胆总管/取石术/肝部分切除/区域型/肝内胆管/结石

Key words

common bile duct/percutaneous nephrolithotomy/regional/intrahepatic bile duct/calculus

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

徐平,曹卫..两种术式治疗区域型肝内胆管结石的临床疗效比较研究[J].西南国防医药,2018,28(4):313-315,3.

西南国防医药

OACSTPCD

1004-0188

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文