| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国现代医学杂志|两种检测HAV-IgM试剂的敏感性评价

两种检测HAV-IgM试剂的敏感性评价

张海莹 王震宇 孔祥沙 季颖 朱凌 魏来

中国现代医学杂志2018,Vol.28Issue(15):88-91,4.
中国现代医学杂志2018,Vol.28Issue(15):88-91,4.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-8982.2018.15.019

两种检测HAV-IgM试剂的敏感性评价

Sensitivity of two immunoassays for detection of Hepatitis A Virus immunoglobulin M

张海莹 1王震宇 1孔祥沙 1季颖 1朱凌 1魏来1

作者信息

  • 1. 北京大学人民医院 北京大学肝病研究所(丙型肝炎和肝病免疫治疗北京市重点实验室),北京 100044
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Absract: Objective To evaluate the sensitivity of two immunoassay kits for anti-Hepatitis A Virus (HAV) IgM.Method On the gold standard confirmed by assay-Abbott HAV-IgM, the sensitivity of the two kits for testing HAVIgM in China were evaluated. The correlation of S/CO value of the two kits with Abbott HAV-IgM were estimated.Results HAV IgM had a sensitivity and specificity of 94.3% and 85.2% respectively with Wantai test, while 97.1% and 91.3% respectively with Gaoda test. HAV-IgM (Abbott) showed a correlation of S/CO valuewith HAV-IgM (Wantai) test and HAV-IgM (Gaoda) test, respectively (r = 0.597 and 0.541, all P = 0.000). HAV-IgM (Wantai) test and HAV-IgM (Gaoda) test showed good consistency with HAV-IgM (Abbott) test, with a k-coefficients of 0.648 and 0.772, respectively. Conclusion HAV-IgM (Wantai) and HAV-IgM (Gaoda) have good detection performances,which provides important reference for clinical detection and seroepidemiology statistics.

关键词

甲型肝炎病毒/IgM/敏感性/一致性

Key words

hepatitis A virus/IgM/sensitivity/concordance rate

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

张海莹,王震宇,孔祥沙,季颖,朱凌,魏来..两种检测HAV-IgM试剂的敏感性评价[J].中国现代医学杂志,2018,28(15):88-91,4.

中国现代医学杂志

OACSTPCD

1005-8982

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文