| 注册
首页|期刊导航|北京大学学报(医学版)|不同表面处理对氧化锆晶相结构及性能的影响

不同表面处理对氧化锆晶相结构及性能的影响

焦洋 王继德 邓久鹏

北京大学学报(医学版)2018,Vol.50Issue(1):49-52,4.
北京大学学报(医学版)2018,Vol.50Issue(1):49-52,4.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.01.008

不同表面处理对氧化锆晶相结构及性能的影响

Effect of different surface treatments on the crystal structure and properties of zirconia

焦洋 1王继德 2邓久鹏2

作者信息

  • 1. 北京大学第一医院口腔科,北京 100034
  • 2. 华北理工大学口腔医学院修复科,河北 唐山 063000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of 3 surface different treatments on the crystal structure,shear bond strength, roughness value and flexural strength of zirconia. Methods: The zirconia specimens were prepared and randomly divided into 4 groups and received the following treatments: (1) blank control group,the specimens without treatments; (2)sandblasting with alumina group,sandblasting the specimens with 110 μm alumina particles for 21 s as working pressure 0. 25 MPa and working distance 10 mm; (3) laser etching group, coating the surface of the specimens with graphite powder and using Er: Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er: YAG) laser to irradiate the surface 30 s; (4) hot-etching group, putting the specimens in a closed reactor within a 1: 1 mixture of 40% (mass traction) nitric acid and 68% (mass traction) hydrofluoric acid liquid, the reaction of 30 min in a water bath at 100 degrees centigrade. The changes of crystal structure, shear bond strength(SBS) and flexural strength of zirconia after different surface treatments were tested. Results: The X-ray diffractometer (XRD) patterns showed that the volume percentage of monoclinic phase of the 4 groups was 0.91%, 12.50%,6.64% and 17.81% respectively. The roughness value for the four groups were as follows: blank control group, (0. 29 ± 0.01) μm; sandblasting with alumina group, (1.05 ±0.11) μm; laser etching group, (0. 73 ±0.04) μm; hot-etching group, (1.31 ±0.06) μm,respectively (P< 0. 05). Mean SBS was (7. 09 ±0. 46) MPa in blank control group, (12.14 ± 1. 51) MPa in sandblasting with alumina group, (8. 82 ±0. 74) MPa in laser etching group and (11. 97 ± 0.99) MPa in hot-etching group. There was no statistically significant difference between sandblasting with alumina group and hot-etching group (P>0. 05), but the difference between the other groups were statistically significant (P <0. 05). Mean three-point bending was (933.70 ±44.13) MPa in blank control group, (850.95 ± 60.66) MPa in sandblasting with alumina group, (771. 53 ±68. 08) MPa in laser etching group and (766. 27 ± 57. 49) MPa in hot-etching group. There was no statistically significant difference between sandblasting with alumina group and hot-etching group (P>0. 05),but the difference between the other groups were statistically significant(P< 0. 05). Conclusion: After different surface treatments, the surface of zirconia has changed from tetragonal to monoclinic phases in varying degrees. In addition, surface treatments could improve the bond strength of zirconia to resin cement, and also lead to a decrease in the flexural strength of zirconia.

关键词

氧化锆/喷砂/热酸蚀

Key words

Zirconia/Sandblasted/Hot-etching

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

焦洋,王继德,邓久鹏..不同表面处理对氧化锆晶相结构及性能的影响[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2018,50(1):49-52,4.

北京大学学报(医学版)

OA北大核心CSCDCSTPCD

1671-167X

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文