| 注册
首页|期刊导航|铁道标准设计|中德铁路路基填料分类对比研究

中德铁路路基填料分类对比研究

华丽晶

铁道标准设计2018,Vol.62Issue(7):57-63,7.
铁道标准设计2018,Vol.62Issue(7):57-63,7.DOI:10.13238/j.issn.1004-2954.201708110002

中德铁路路基填料分类对比研究

Comparative Study on Classification of Subgrade Filling in Chinese and German Railways

华丽晶1

作者信息

  • 1. 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司,武汉 430063
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Under the guidance of the country's major strategy of " The Belt and Road" and for the purpose of promoting the acceptance and recognition of Chinese standards by other countries,this paper conducts a systematic analysis of the classification criteria of the German railway geotechnical classification,the type of filler,the filling site of the filler,the compaction index and the standard of roadbed packing with reference to the design of the subgrade of a railway in Libya,and compares them with the Chinese railway standards.It is concluded that the main difference between the classification of geotechnical and subgrade filling of Chinese and German railways is the difference between the uniform classification and the particle size accumulation.The difference in the foundation of bedrock is mainly the difference between the single layer and the multi-layer,and the compaction index and the standard of subgrade are much the same.These differences and similarities are of great significance to the design of subgrade fillers in overseas railway projects subject to German standards.

关键词

铁路/路基填料/填料类型/填筑部位/压实指标

Key words

Railway/Subgrade filling/Classification of subgrade filling/Site of subgrade filling/Compaction Index

分类

交通工程

引用本文复制引用

华丽晶..中德铁路路基填料分类对比研究[J].铁道标准设计,2018,62(7):57-63,7.

铁道标准设计

OA北大核心

1004-2954

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文