摘要
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To conduct the economic evaluation of recombinant human type Ⅱ tumor necrosis factor receptorantibody fusion protein (trade name: Etanercept) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.METHODS: By literature retrieval, foreign literatures about Etanercept "head to head" research or Chinese literatures about the comparison of recombinant human type Ⅱ tumor necrosis factor receptor-antibody fusion protein with infliximab and adalimumab were collected. The costs were localized, indicators of effectiveness were converted into quality-adjusted life year (QALY), then cost-utility analysis (CUA) and incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) were conducted. RESULTS: Three qualified literatures were acquired. The translational research of the first report of WU B and so forth (2012 year) showed that CUA of Etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab were 48. 2, 36. 6 and 104. 6 thousand yuan/QALY, and ICUR were 119. 8, 116. 4 and 313. 4 thousand yuan/QALY, respectively. The translational research of the second report of Santos-Moreno P and so forth (2015 year) showed that CUA of Etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab were 93. 1, 118. 2 and 249. 2 thousand yuan/QALY, and ICUR were 117. 5, 151. 3 and 327. 9 thousand yuan/QALY, respectively. The translational research of the third report of Santos-Moreno P and so forth (2016 year) showed that CUA of Etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab were 107. 0, 131. 6 and 273. 8 thousand yuan/QALY, and ICUR were 139. 6, 172. 5 and 369. 8 thousand yuan/QALY, respectively. ICUR of Etanercept were all smaller than 3 times of GDP 148. 1 thousand yuan in 2015. CONCLUSIONS: From the results of the study of these 3 literatures, compared with infliximab and adalimumab, Etanercept shows economy for rheumatoid arthritis.关键词
重组人Ⅱ型肿瘤坏死因子受体-抗体融合蛋白/类风湿关节炎/成本-效用分析/增量成本-效用分析Key words
Recombinant human type Ⅱ tumor necrosis factor receptor-antibody fusion protein/Rheumatoid arthritis/Costutility analysis/Incremental cost-utility ratio分类
医药卫生
