现代医院2018，Vol.18Issue(5)：739-740,743,3.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-332X.2018.05.036
不同调牙合方式用于后牙种植修复的疗效比较
Comparison of the Effect of Different Adjustment Methods (Occlusion) in the Restoration of Posterior Teeth
黄娴君 1曾远胜1
作者信息
- 1. 湛江中心人民医院 广东 湛江 524045
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To investigate the effect of different adjustment methods (occlusion) in dental implant repair. Methods 96 cases of patients with dental implant repair treated in our hospital from June 2015 to February 2017 were selected as the research object and randomly divided into the control group and the observation group with 48 cases in each group. The biting surfaces of the patients were reduced in the observation group, but the patients in the control group were treated with the original adjustment methods (occlusion). The bite balance and masticatory function of the two groups were evaluated at 3 months and 6 months after repair respectively. The occlusal balance was set up by computer to set the X and Y axes, and the X-axis and Y-axis values of the two groups were monitored. And measured the molars asymmetry index(AMOF), to calculate the ratio of each tooth occlusal force, and the larger the AMOF value, the more asymmetrical the bite force is. Chewing function score of 10 points, the higher the score that chewing better. Results Compared with the control group, the indexes of occlusal balance in the observation group at 3 months after repair were significantly increased (P＜0. 05), and at 6 months after repair, the AMOF (P＜0. 05). Compared with the control group, the scores of chewing function in the observation group at 3 months and 6 months after repair were significantly increased, there was statistical difference between the two groups Significance (P＜0. 05). Conclusion The effect of biting surface reduced (occlusion) in dental implan.关键词
调牙合方式/牙种植修复/咀嚼功能/咬合平衡Key words
Modulation (Occlusion)/Dental Implant Repair/Masticatory Function/Occlusal Balance分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
黄娴君,曾远胜..不同调牙合方式用于后牙种植修复的疗效比较[J].现代医院,2018,18(5):739-740,743,3.
