中国实用口腔科杂志2018，Vol.11Issue(5)：282-285,4.DOI:10.19538/j.kq.2018.05.005
常规种植术与骨挤压种植术对上颌后牙区Ⅲ类骨种植5年成功率及边缘骨吸收量的影响比较研究
A comparison research of the five-year success rate of implant and the alveolar bone absorption around the implants implanted with conventional drilling technique or osteotome technique in the posterior maxilla which is Ⅲ sclerotin
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the five-year success rate of implant and the alveolar bone absorption around the implants implanted with conventional drilling technique or osteotome technique in the posterior maxilla which is Ⅲ sclerotin. Methods A total of 111 implants from 82 cases treated in the Oral Implantology Center of Affiliated Dental Hospital of China Medical University in the posterior maxilla (Ⅲ sclerotin) between January 2010 and December 2011 were enrolled in this study. According to whether with osteotome technique or not, these cases were divided into conventional drilling technique group and osteotome technique group. Postoperative follow-up lasted for 5 years;calculate the fiveyear success rate of the two groups and the alveolar bone absorption around the implants at the first half year, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years after implantation;compare the five-year success rate and the alveolar bone absorption around the implants implanted with conventional drilling technique or osteotome technique in the posterior maxilla which is Ⅲ sclerotin. Results The five-year success rate of conventional drilling technique group and osteotome technique group in the posterior maxilla (Ⅲ sclerotin) was 96.23％ and 98.28％ respectively, the differences being insignificant (P＞ 0.05). The differences in the alveolar bone absorption around the implants was insignificant (P＞ 0.05) at the lst, 2 nd and 3 rd year of implantation, but was significant in the first half year after implantation (P ＜ 0.05). Conclusion In the implanting in posterior maxilla (Ⅲsclerotin), no significant statistical differences in the five-year success rate or the alveolar bone absorption around the implants is found long-term effects between the two methods. Therefore, in implantion of Ⅲ sclerotin in posterior maxilla, performer of the implantation can decide whether osteotome technique is performed according to the early stability of the implant.关键词
上颌后牙区/常规种植/骨挤压/成功率/边缘骨吸收Key words
posterior maxilla/conventional drilling/osteotome/success rate/alveolar bone absorption分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
谢艳婷,葛鑫,顾舒扬,张燕婷,江鹭鹭,何晶,尚德浩,邓春富,赵宝红..常规种植术与骨挤压种植术对上颌后牙区Ⅲ类骨种植5年成功率及边缘骨吸收量的影响比较研究[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2018,11(5):282-285,4.基金项目
辽宁省自然科学基金 (20170541059) （20170541059）
辽宁省科技计划项目 (2013225049) （2013225049）
沈阳市科技计划项目 (F11-264-1-25) （F11-264-1-25）
