气候变化研究进展2018，Vol.14Issue(3)：275-280,6.DOI:10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2017.083
国际典型碳数据库对中国碳排放核算的对比分析
Comparison analysis of China's emissions accounting by typical international carbon databases
摘要
Abstract
Four typical international carbon databases International Energy Agency (IEA), Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC), The Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) and Energy Information Administration (EIA) have been selected to carry out a comparison analysis of their carbon emissions accounting for China''s fossil fuels and cement production. The results show that:1) the accounting by IEA and EDGAR is more detailed;2) there is a large difference in activity data classification for the four carbon databases, which is 8, 4, 8, 5 for coal-based fuels, 15, 10, 14, 13 for oil-based fuels, and 4, 1, 4, 2 for gaseous fuels;3) the carbon emission factors are selected in different way, some use the institute''s own China-specific parameter, some use the default value from IPCC.关键词
碳数据库/对比分析/中国碳排放/燃料分类Key words
Carbon database/Comparison analysis/China's carbon emissions/Fuels classification引用本文复制引用
李青青,苏颖,尚丽,魏伟,王茂华..国际典型碳数据库对中国碳排放核算的对比分析[J].气候变化研究进展,2018,14(3):275-280,6.基金项目
上海市科学技术委员会重点研发项目 (15DZ1170600) （15DZ1170600）
