国际医药卫生导报2018，Vol.24Issue(20)：3163-3165,3.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2018.20.037
经输尿管软镜取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石临床对比研究
Ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of renal calculi
杨青彦 1王长安 1李涛 1韩健乐 1杨帅平 1杨俊伟 1王晓勃1
作者信息
- 1. 450016 郑州市第七人民医院肾移植肾内科
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To explore the clinical effects of ureteroscopic litbotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal calculi.Methods 85 cases of renal calculi treated at our hospital were randomly divided into a control group (n=42) and an observation group (n=43).The control group were treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy,and the observation group with ureteroscopic lithotomy.The stone clearance rate,intraoperative bleeding volume,operation time,complication rate,and quality of life were compared between the two groups.Results The stone clearance rate in the observation group was 90.70％ (39/43),while that in the control group was 92.86％ (39/42),with no statistical difference between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05).The operation time was longer and the bleeding volume was lower in the observation group than in the control group,with statistical difference (P ＜ 0.05).The complication rate was lower in the observation group than in the control group [2.33％ (1/43) vs.19.05％ (8/42),P ＜ 0.05].Conclusion Ureteroscopic lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy both are effective in treating renal calculi,but the former has lower bleeding volume and complication rate.关键词
经输尿管软镜取石术/经皮肾镜取石术/肾结石Key words
Ureteroscopic lithotripsy/Percutaneous nephrolithotomy/Renal calculi引用本文复制引用
杨青彦,王长安,李涛,韩健乐,杨帅平,杨俊伟,王晓勃..经输尿管软镜取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石临床对比研究[J].国际医药卫生导报,2018,24(20):3163-3165,3.
