医学新知杂志2018，Vol.28Issue(6)：640-642,645,4.DOI:10.3969／j.issn.10045511.2018.06.021
阴道式与腹腔镜术治疗外生型剖宫产瘢痕部妊娠的比较
ComparationofVaginalandLaparoscopicSurgeryfor ExogenousCesareanScarPregnancy
李代红1
作者信息
- 1. 467000河南平顶山,平顶山市第一人民医院妇产科
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective Tocomparetheeffectsofvaginalandlaparoscopicsurgeryforexogenouscesareanscar pregnancy(CSP).Methods Atotalof88exogenousCSPpatientswereselectedanddividedintovaginalgroupand laparoscopicgroupwith44casesineachgroup.ThevaginalgroupwastreatedwithvaginalCSPresectionandlaparoscopicgroupwastreatedwithlaparoscopicCSPresection.Theoperationtime,intraoperativebloodloss,hospitalization time,hospitalizationcosts,postoperativepaingrade,therecoverytimeofbloodβ－hCGandmenstruationlaswellas theoverallincidenceofcomplicationswerecomparedbetweenthetworoups.Results Therewasnosignificantdifferenceinsuccessratebetweenthetwogroups(90.91%vs.95.45%)(P＞0.05).Thetotalincidenceofcomplications invaginalgroup(18.18%)wassignificantlylowerthanthatinlaparoscopicgroup(40.91%)(P＜0.05).Theoperationtime,intraoperativebloodlossandhospitalizationcostsinvaginalgroupweresignificantlylowerthanthoseinlaparoscopicgroup(P＜0.05).Therewerenosignificantdifferencesinpostoperativepaingrade,therecoverytimeof bloodβ－hCGandmenstruationbetweenthetwogroups(P＞0.05).Conclusion ThevaginalCSPresectionisbetter withgoodeffectsandlesscomplications.关键词
外生型/剖宫产瘢痕部妊娠/经阴道/腹腔镜Key words
Exogenoustype/Cesareanscarpregnancy/Vaginal/Laparoscopy分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
李代红..阴道式与腹腔镜术治疗外生型剖宫产瘢痕部妊娠的比较[J].医学新知杂志,2018,28(6):640-642,645,4.
