| 注册
首页|期刊导航|测井技术|W-S模型与双水模型对泥质砂岩附加导电性描述的对比分析

W-S模型与双水模型对泥质砂岩附加导电性描述的对比分析

王亮 李昱翰 任丽梅 宋林珂 苏静

测井技术2018,Vol.42Issue(6):622-628,7.
测井技术2018,Vol.42Issue(6):622-628,7.DOI:10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2018.06.003

W-S模型与双水模型对泥质砂岩附加导电性描述的对比分析

Comparison of W-S Model and Dual Water Model in Describing the Additional Conductivity of Argillaceous Sandstone

王亮 1李昱翰 2任丽梅 3宋林珂 3苏静3

作者信息

  • 1. 西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室, 四川 成都 610500
  • 2. 中国石油大学地球物理与信息工程学院, 北京 102249
  • 3. 西南油气田分公司川中油气矿, 四川 遂宁 834000
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Based on the study of a large number of argillaceous sandstone core data, this paper discusses the debate between Clavier and Waxman for the W-S model and the dual-water model:whether the conductivity of the argillaceous sandstone and the cementation index are affected by the additional conductivity of the cation.The study found that compared with the dual-water model, the W-S model can better describe the conductivity of argillaceous sandstones.In addition, under the conditions of low temperature and low formation water salinity or hightemperature and high-layer water salinity, the dual-water model cannot describe the conductivity of argillaceous sandstone very well;compared with the cementation index (mo) in the dual-water model, the cementation index (m*) in the W-S model is not affected by the additional conductivity of the rock cation, but is controlled by the pore structure.

关键词

测井解释/W-S模型/双水模型/泥质砂岩/饱和度/胶结指数

Key words

log interpretation/W-S model/dual water model/argillaceous sandstone/saturation/cementation index

分类

天文与地球科学

引用本文复制引用

王亮,李昱翰,任丽梅,宋林珂,苏静..W-S模型与双水模型对泥质砂岩附加导电性描述的对比分析[J].测井技术,2018,42(6):622-628,7.

基金项目

四川盆地大型碳酸盐岩气田开发示范工程 (2016ZX05052) (2016ZX05052)

国家自然基金项目"页岩气储层微观孔隙结构连续定量表征与含气量评价" (41504108) (41504108)

国土资源部沉积盆地与油气资源重点实验室开放性基金项目"页岩气储层含气量评价" (Zdsys2015003) (Zdsys2015003)

四川省教育厅自然科学类基金项目"页岩气储层微观孔隙结构实验表征及连续定量评价方法" (15ZB0057) (15ZB0057)

中国博士后科学基金面上资助"多因素耦合作用下的致密油储层孔隙结构与含油性评价" (2015M582568) 联合资助 (2015M582568)

测井技术

OACSTPCD

1004-1338

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文