实用医学杂志2019，Vol.35Issue(4)：593-597,601,6.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2019.04.019
自体腘绳肌腱加腓骨长肌腱前束与LARS韧带重建断裂后交叉韧带疗效比较
A comparative study on the effect of reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament with Autogenous hamstring tendon plus Peroneus longus tendon anterior bundle and LARS ligament
摘要
Abstract
Objective To investigate the effect of the use of autologous hamstring tendon plus peroneal longus tendon and the application of LARS artificial ligament reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) knee function and recovery of mechanical stability. Methods Forty-three patients with posterior cruciate ligament rupture were divided into two groups according to the type of graft used during the operation : the LARS artificial ligament group (22 cases) and the autologous hamstring tendon plus peroneal longus tendon group (21 cases). The postoperative follow-up time was at least two years. The knee joint function was evaluated using the knee joint Lysholm score, IKDC score, and Tegner score. The post-drawer test evaluated mechanical stability. Results After 43 cases were followed up completely, the knee joint stability and function indexes of the two groups were significantly improved compared with preoperative ones. The differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).At the same time, for all postoperative scores, two There was no significant difference between groups (P> 0.05).Conclusion The application of autologous hamstring tendons plus peroneal longus tendon anterior bundle and LARS artificial ligament reconstruction posterior cruciate ligament can achieve satisfactory clinical curative effect.关键词
后交叉韧带/重建/关节镜/LARS人工韧带/自体腘绳肌腱/腓骨长肌腱前束Key words
posterior cruciate ligament/reconstruction/arthroscopy/lars artificial ligament/autogenous hamstring tendon/peroneus longus tendon anterior bundle引用本文复制引用
刘旭,温昱,李彬..自体腘绳肌腱加腓骨长肌腱前束与LARS韧带重建断裂后交叉韧带疗效比较[J].实用医学杂志,2019,35(4):593-597,601,6.基金项目
辽宁省自然科学基金面上项目(编号:20170540998) （编号:20170540998）
