| 注册
首页|期刊导航|护理学报|中文版肿瘤信息满意度量表在头颈肿瘤患者中的信效度分析

中文版肿瘤信息满意度量表在头颈肿瘤患者中的信效度分析

李玉1 刘俐惠2a 石增霞2b 亢东琴3 陈志琦1 王自盼1 王璟1 郭红1 岳树锦1

护理学报2019,Vol.26Issue(9):10-15,6.
护理学报2019,Vol.26Issue(9):10-15,6.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.09.010

中文版肿瘤信息满意度量表在头颈肿瘤患者中的信效度分析

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Satisfaction with Cancer lnformation Profile in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer

李玉1 1刘俐惠2a 2石增霞2b 3亢东琴3 4陈志琦1 1王自盼1 1王璟1 1郭红1 1岳树锦11

作者信息

  • 1. 北京中医药大学 护理学院,北京 102488
  • 2. 北京世纪坛医院 护理部,北京 100038
  • 3. 北京世纪坛医院 耳鼻喉头颈外科,北京 100038
  • 4. 北京大学肿瘤医院暨北京市肿瘤防治研究所 护理部,北京 100142
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To conduct cross-cultural adaptation and analyze the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Satisfaction with Cancer Information Profile (SCIP) in patients with head and neck cancer. Methods Brislin's translation steps were used to translate and introduce the scale. The internal consistency of the scale was evaluated with Cronbachαcoefficient and the validity of the scale by content validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity and exploratory factor analysis. Results The content validity of the scale was 0.875~1.000. The convergent validity of subscale SCIP-A was 0.649~0.787; the distinguishing validity 0.118~0.422, and the range of correlation coefficient 0.458~0.557. In exploratory factor analysis, the KMO value was 0.809. Three common factors (side effect, long-term effect, social/economic impact) were extracted, and 54.92% of the total variation was explained. The Cronbach αcoefficients of SCIP-A and SCIP-B were 0.826 and 0.947, respectively. Conclusion The Chinese version of SCIP has good reliability and validity and is suitable for monitoring information satisfaction of head and neck cancer patients.

关键词

头颈肿瘤/信息满意度/信度/效度

Key words

head and neck tumor/ satisfaction with cancer information/ reliability/ validity

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

李玉1,刘俐惠2a,石增霞2b,亢东琴3,陈志琦1,王自盼1,王璟1,郭红1,岳树锦1..中文版肿瘤信息满意度量表在头颈肿瘤患者中的信效度分析[J].护理学报,2019,26(9):10-15,6.

护理学报

OACSTPCD

2097-6569

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文