| 注册
首页|期刊导航|分子影像学杂志|偏分野与均分野在容积调强治疗和调强放疗治疗鼻腔鼻窦癌中的剂量学比较

偏分野与均分野在容积调强治疗和调强放疗治疗鼻腔鼻窦癌中的剂量学比较

潘建南 冯惠怡 邓永锦

分子影像学杂志2019,Vol.42Issue(2):166-171,6.
分子影像学杂志2019,Vol.42Issue(2):166-171,6.

偏分野与均分野在容积调强治疗和调强放疗治疗鼻腔鼻窦癌中的剂量学比较

Dosimetric comparison of equispaced fields and non-equispaced fields in VMAT and IMRT for Nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer

潘建南 1冯惠怡 1邓永锦2

作者信息

  • 1. 南方医科大学顺德医院放射治疗科,广东 佛山 528308
  • 2. 中山大学附属第一医院放疗科,广东 广州 ?510080
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare dosimetric differences between intensity modulated radiotherapy( IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in the radiotherapy plan of nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer, provide reference basis for selecting the best clinical treatment.MethodsTen patients with nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancers were selected. The patients were received the VMAT plans which were created as non-equispaced fields of VMAT and equispaced fields of VMAT, and IMRT plans which were created as non-equispaced fields and equispaced fields of 5 beams and 7 beams. Dosimetry of different design methods were compared to assess the coverage rate, heterogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI) in the target volum, exposure dose of the organs at risk and therapeutic efficiency.ResultAll of coverages of IMRT plans and VMAT plans met the criteria of clinic. VMAT plans were still better than IMRT plans, the differences between IMRT plans of 5 beams were significant.For CI of PTV1, VMAT (including partial arc and full arc) were better than IMRT(including non-equispaced fields and equispaced fields) . Exposure dose of the organs at risk: for brain stem, Dmax and D1% of VMAT plans were lower than IMRT plans, and D1% of partial arc were lower than full arc (P<0.05). For Lens, VMAT plans had a same or better protective effect than IMRT plans, Dmax and D1% of VMAT plans were lower than most of those of IMRT(P<0.05). For Optic nerves-Ipsilateral, Dmax of VMAT plans were lower than those of IMRT (P<0.05). For Chiasm, Dmax and D1% of VMAT plans were lower than most of those of IMRT (P<0.05). For Parotid-Ipsilateral, Dmean of VMAT plans were lower than most of those of IMRT(P<0.05). Compared with IMRT plans, VMAT plans showed fewer MUs (about 1/3) (P<0.05).ConclusionNon-equispaced field can be considered as the radiotherapy field design of Nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer.Depending on the machine conditions, the partial arc of VMAT is more advantageous than the non-equispaced fields of IMRT.

关键词

鼻窦鼻腔癌/ 偏分野/ 均分野/ 偏分弧/ 全弧/

Key words

nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer/ non-equispaced fields/ equispaced fields/ partial arc/ full arc/

引用本文复制引用

潘建南,冯惠怡,邓永锦..偏分野与均分野在容积调强治疗和调强放疗治疗鼻腔鼻窦癌中的剂量学比较[J].分子影像学杂志,2019,42(2):166-171,6.

分子影像学杂志

OACSTPCD

1674-4500

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文