肿瘤预防与治疗2019，Vol.32Issue(1)：61-66,6.DOI:10. 3969／j. issn. 1674-0904. 2019. 01. 009
宫颈癌外照射Pinnacle与Monaco系统容积调强物理方案的比较分析及方案质量评估模型的创建
Two Physical Schemes of External Radiation for Cervical Cancer and the Establishment of Scheme Quality Evaluation Model: A Comparison of Pin-nacle and Monaco Treatment Planning Systems
摘要
Abstract
ng this. On the basis of that, we created a new model, f(TCP~NTCP), for evaluating the quality of physical scheme, and tested its validity against the f(EUD) model reported in an article. Results:Traditional evaluation methods could not tell the difference between pV-Plan or mV-Plan. Instead, the f(TCP~NTCP) mod-el could. Those results were in accord with the results from f(EUD) model. Conclusion: The traditional method for evalua- ting the quality of physical scheme is insufficient. f( TCP ~NTCP) model can be used as a new and adjuvant model for evaluating the quality of physical scheme.关键词
宫颈癌/物理方案质量/评估模型Key words
Cervical cancer/ Physical scheme quality/ E-valuation model分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
Bai Han,Wu Xingrao,Chen Feihu,Liu Xuhong,Yan Jiawen..宫颈癌外照射Pinnacle与Monaco系统容积调强物理方案的比较分析及方案质量评估模型的创建[J].肿瘤预防与治疗,2019,32(1):61-66,6.基金项目
云南省应用基础研究(编号:2017FE468-221) This study was supported by Basic Research Project of Yunnan Province (NO. 2017FE468-221) （编号:2017FE468-221）
