数字中医药（英文）2020，Vol.3Issue(3)：222-226,5.DOI:10.1016/j.dcmed.2020.09.008
中医超常规诊疗技术正当性评判标准初探
A Preliminary Study on Legitimacy Identification Standards for Unconventional Treatment Technologies in Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘要
Abstract
Compared with western medicine with objective and standardized theories, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) places more emphasis on subjective thinking. Moreover, there are several academic schools under TCM, and ancient secret prescriptions and proven prescriptions play important roles in TCM treatments. However, the drugs used by some academic schools and some ancient secret prescriptions and proven prescriptions often contradict mainstream theories, and some TCM treatment methods do not significantly conform to the methods that are considered safe by the Chinese Pharmacopoeia (2015 edition), medical textbooks and other canonical books. Despite the long history and abundant successful experiences of TCM treatments, controversies regarding these unconventional treatment technologies, specifically when these breach the safety standards of treatment, exist considering that several medical adverse effects are observed when performing these unconventional treatments. In view of this, distinguishing "well-defined technological breakthrough" from "medical fault" is considered necessary. This study discusses the issue and raises constructive suggestions on the corresponding identification standards for unconventional treatment strategies in TCM.关键词
中医/超常规诊疗/医疗过错/鉴定Key words
Traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)/Unconventional treatment/Medical fault/Identification引用本文复制引用
刘大华,曹书华..中医超常规诊疗技术正当性评判标准初探[J].数字中医药（英文）,2020,3(3):222-226,5.基金项目
We thank for the funding support from the Hunan Provincial Situation Advisory Project (No. 2013ZZ5). （No. 2013ZZ5）
