摘要
Abstract
The writing of Qin Shihuang in Records of the Grand Historian(Shiji)and the Comprehensive Reference of Capital Administration(Zizhitongjian)is the expression of the textualization of Sima Qian and Sima Guang's historical memory.By reading two books of Qin Shi Huang's writing,we can find the difference between Sima Qian's"six compatible"and Sima Guang's"Confucian dominance"in political standpoint through Sima Guang's intentional reconstruction of Qin Shi Huang's memory.Entering into the text of the two books,Sima Qian gathered the historical memory of different subjects and different material forms to construct the text,form-ing a"polysyllabus".Sima Guang edited and condensed the narrative to a"monologue".Behind this is the difference between Sima Qian's writing purpose of"being a family's opinion"and Sima Guang's"having the a-bility to rule the way in view of the past".Finally,the two books also present two different images of the first Emperor of Qin,which are"both merits and faults"and"great SINS",which are also different from the images of the first emperor in the unearthed documents such as Qin Jian in the sleeping tiger land and bamboo Jian in Peking University.Taking text as a kind of memory discussion under writing,historical memory will be recon-structed in different writing positions,and will be explained again under the control of different writing purpo-ses,which has the characteristics of pluralism,existence and historicity.The choice of this perspective helps to break the thinking of literature as the carrier of historical facts,and is of great benefit to our understanding of the differences in the writing of the first emperor of two Sima,and the relationship between historical memory and history.关键词
《史记》/《资治通鉴》/秦始皇/历史记忆/人物书写Key words
Records of the Grand Historian/Comprehensive Reference of Capital Administration/The First Emperor of Qin/historical memory/character writing分类
社会科学
