融合Altmetrics指标的领域高产学者综合影响力研究OACHSSCDCSTPCD

[Purpose/Meaning]Evaluating the influence of high-yield scholars is conducive to promote the enthusi-asm of scholars,and can also provide references for superiors to introduce outstanding talents.The highly-productive schol-ars defined by Price Law are the influential backbone in a research field and play a crucial guiding role in scientific re-search.However,it is limited to judge the influence of scholars according to the single index of scientific research output.In addition to evaluate the absolute quantity of scholars'scientific research output,the quality of scientific research achieve-ments shall also be considered within a reasonable evaluation method of scholars'influence,so as to carry out a multi-di-mensional evaluation research on the comprehensive influence of scholars,including academic level.[Method/Process]In this paper,the study took three Nature Biotech sub-journals as examples,and their official websites were our data sources.On the basis of previous studies,the traditional index and Altmetrics index were selected then the relevant data were col-lected.The evaluation index system for highly-productive scholars was constructed separately from two dimensions which are scientific influence and social influence.Firstly,the indicators were screened by correlation analysis and other methods.Then factor analysis and principal component analysis were used to evaluate the scientific influence and social influence of highly-productive scholars,the correlation between the two dimensions was analyzed as well.Finally,the two-dimensional measurement results of the influence of highly-productive scholars were obtained.[Results/Conclusions]The results show that there is a large gap between the ranking of most scholars in the two influence dimensions,and the two dimensions show a strong positive correlation.Therefore,it is reasonable for this paper to combine the traditional index which illustrate sci-entific influence with the Altmetrics index which illustrate social influence to evaluate the comprehensive influence of highly-productive scholars.At the same time,by comparing the comprehensive influence of highly-productive scholars with dif-ferent amounts of publications in this field,it is found that the"high output"of scientific research results do not complete-ly mean"high quality",indicating that scholars should abandon the concept of putting the number of publications first,but to form a real team of high-quality prolific scholars to boost the development of the field.