中国内镜杂志2023，Vol.29Issue(12)：26-30,5.DOI:10.12235/E20230068
两种外耳道胆脂瘤手术方法的临床疗效比较
Comparison of clinical effect of two methods for cholesteatoma of external auditory canal
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the surgical results of cholesteatoma of external auditory canal under the otoscope and the microscope.Methods Clinical data of 44 patients with cholesteatoma from January 2015 to December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively.According to the operation mode,the patients were divided into observation group and control group.The cholesteatoma in the observation group was cleaned under the otoscope,and the cholesteatoma in the control group was cleaned under the microscope.The clinical effects of the two groups were compared.Results The patients in both groups were cured and their hearing was improved in different degrees.Compared with the control group,the difference of speech frequency hearing threshold between the observation group and the control group was statistically significant(t = 19.71,t = 13.41,P＜0.05).The operation time of the observation group was short than that of the control group,and the local discomfort of the observation group was lighter than that of the control group after operation,which was statistically significant(t =-3.68,t =-2.44,P＜0.05).All the patients were followed up for 6 months with dry ears and no recurrence.Conclusion Endoscopic treatment of cholesteatoma of external auditory canal is simple and effective,which is worthy of clinical application.关键词
外耳道胆脂瘤/耳内镜/显微镜Key words
cholesteatoma of external auditory canal/otoendoscopy/microscope分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
李巍,王浩,丁锐,张燕灵,张艳秋..两种外耳道胆脂瘤手术方法的临床疗效比较[J].中国内镜杂志,2023,29(12):26-30,5.基金项目
徐州市科技项目(No:KC22104) （No:KC22104）
