中国临床心理学杂志2023，Vol.31Issue(6)：1438-1441,4.DOI:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2023.06.028
中国心身疾病患者中DSM-5与ICD-11关于创伤后应激障碍的比较
A Comparison of ICD-11 and DSM-5 Criteria of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder among Psychosomatic Patients
摘要
Abstract
Objective:This study aimed at comparing the prevalence and comorbidity differences of PTSD according to ICD-11 and DSM-5 definition among psychosomatic patients.Methods:A total of 485 adults exposed to traumatic events were included in this study.The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 was used to measure PTSD symptoms.The Patient Health Questionnaire(PHQ-9)and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7(GAD-7)were used to measure depression,and anxiety symptoms.Results:The DSM-5 prevalence rate was significantly higher than ICD-11 criteria.The ICD-11 criteria could significantly reduce the rate of comorbidity with MDD but not GAD.Conclusion:The results revealed that the ICD-11 and DSM-5 provided different prevalence of PTSD and comorbidity rates with MDD.This study carries implications for under-standing the nature of the definition of PTSD and adds to knowledge about organizing and application of these two global ap-plied criteria of PTSD.关键词
精神障碍诊断与统计手册(第五版)/国际疾病分类(第十一次修订版)/创伤后应激障碍/心身疾病患者/共病Key words
DSM-5/ICD-11/Posttraumatic stress disorder/Psychosomatic patients/Comorbidity分类
医药卫生引用本文复制引用
罗澍,刘平,毕亚杰,闫一民,方若蛟,曹成琦,王力..中国心身疾病患者中DSM-5与ICD-11关于创伤后应激障碍的比较[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2023,31(6):1438-1441,4.基金项目
本研究受到国家自然科学基金项目(U21A20364,31971020和32300918),国家社会科学基金重大项目(20ZDA079),应急管理部消防救援总局重点研发项目(2020XFZD07)及中国科学院心理研究所自主部署项目(E2CX4115CX和E1CX161005)支持. （U21A20364,31971020和32300918）
