|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|肝胆胰外科杂志|肝脏局灶性结节增生13例磁共振误诊分析及病理对照

肝脏局灶性结节增生13例磁共振误诊分析及病理对照OACSTPCD

Misdiagnosis analysis of MRI in comparison with pathological findings in 13 cases of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 探讨肝脏局灶性结节增生(FNH)的磁共振成像(MRI)可能误诊原因并进行病理对照分析,以加深认识.方法 回顾性分析2015年1月至2023年1月期间浙江省丽水中心医院经病理证实的21例FNH患者资料,2名评估者在不知晓病理结果的情况下共同评估病灶的MRI征象(包括病灶一般情况、平扫信号、增强扫描强化表现及周围组织伴随征象)并做出诊断,对评估结论达成一致意见;以病理结果为金标准,对误诊病例进行病理对照及误诊原因分析.结果 21例肝脏FNH中的13例患者共13个病灶被误诊,其中被误诊为肝细胞癌4例,肿块型肝内胆管细胞癌1例,转移瘤1例,孤立性纤维瘤3例,上皮样血管平滑肌脂肪瘤2例,肝细胞腺瘤2例.病理对照分析:2例MRI上见"假包膜征"的病灶在镜下无明显假包膜;而3例镜下存在假包膜的病灶却未能识别出MRI"假包膜征".3例MRI上见"局部坏死",但本组13例镜下均无局部缺血坏死表现.2例MRI上被评估为存在"脂肪变性征"的病灶在镜下均存在较明显的脂肪细胞积聚;MRI上无"脂肪变性征"者在镜下也无明显脂肪变性.11例病灶在镜下可见瘢痕,但在MRI中13例病灶均未能识别"延迟强化瘢痕".结论 肝脏FNH的误诊原因主要有:中央瘢痕缺失或瘢痕的形态/信号/强化不典型、病灶出现肝细胞癌征象"脂肪变性"、误判存在肝细胞癌征象"假包膜征";此外,病灶外生性生长与肝外其他脏器紧贴、"评估者受临床病史的影响"可能也会导致误诊.

Objective To explore the possible causes of misdiagnosis of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia(FNH)by magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)in comparison with pathological findings.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the data from hepatic FNH patients confirmed by pathology(21 cases)at the Lishui Central Hospital in Zhejiang Province from Jan.2015 to Jan.2023.Two evaluators assessed the MRI features of the lesions(including general characteristics,signals on the plain scan,enhancement patterns,and accompanying features of the surrounding tissues)without the knowledge of the pathological results,and made the diagnosis based on consensus.Misdiagnosed cases were subjected to pathological findings and analysis of the reasons for misdiagnosis using the pathological results as the gold standard.Results Thirteen patients(with an average of one FNH lesion per person)were misdiagnosed,with four cases misdiagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma,one case as a mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma,one case as a metastatic tumor,three cases as solitary fibrous tumors,two cases as epithelioid angiomyolipomas,and two cases as hepatocellular adenomas.In two cases with"false capsule signs"on MRI,no obvious false capsule was found under the microscope,while three lesions with false capsules under the microscope were not identified as having the"false capsule sign"on MRI.Three lesions showed"local necrosis"on MRI,but none of the 13 lesions showed signs of local ischemic necrosis under the microscope.Two lesions were evaluated as having"fatty degeneration signs"on MRI,and both showed obvious accumulation of fat cells under the microscope.Lesions without"fatty degeneration signs"on MRI also showed no obvious fatty degeneration under the microscope.Eleven lesions showed scars under the microscope,but none of the 13 lesions were identified as having"delayed enhanced scars"on MRI.Conclusion The main reasons for misdiagnosis of hepatic FNH by MRI are the absence of central scars or atypical morphology/signal/enhancement of scars,the appearance of"fatty degeneration sign"of hepatocellular carcinoma in the lesions,and misjudgment of the presence of the"false capsule sign"of hepatocellular carcinoma.In addition,misdiagnosis may also be caused by the exogenous growth of lesions that are closely adhered to other organs outside the liver and by evaluators being influenced by clinical history.

潘俊俏;李炳荣;孙洪鸣

丽水市松阳人民医院 放射科,浙江丽水 323400丽水市中心医院放射科,浙江丽水 323000丽水市中心医院病理科,浙江丽水 323000

临床医学

肝肿瘤局灶性结节增生磁共振成像病理

liver neoplasmsfocal nodular hyperplasiamagnetic resonance imagingpathology

《肝胆胰外科杂志》 2024 (001)

20-25 / 6

浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2022ZH078).

10.11952/j.issn.1007-1954.2024.01.004

评论