沈阳工业大学学报（社会科学版）2023，Vol.16Issue(6)：584-592,9.DOI:10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2023.06.12
《民法典》中所有权保留公示规则之解释论
Interpretation of publicity rules of title retention in Civil Code
摘要
Abstract
Most Chinese scholars believe that Civil Code has fully realized the functionalization of chattel guarantee transaction rules and unified the system of real right for security and the atypical guarantee rules.Article 57 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court of the Relevant Guarantee System of the Civil Code of People's Republic of China also includes the title retention into the competition rules for the real right of chattel security.All these are wrong interpretations of the system of title retention in Civil Code.The Civil Code abides by the formalism tradition of chattel guarantee transaction,the guarantee system arrangement and the effect of publicity of title retention do not reflect the functional unity of title retention guarantee and security interest rules,and there is lack of institutional space for the competitive existence of title retention and security interest.The application of the rule of disclosure of title retention is independent of the rule of real right for security,and should follow the methods of textual interpretation,systematic interpretation and objective interpretation.The"ownership"retained by the seller is neither the abstract and absolute ownership of the traditional civil law in continental law system,nor the traditional real right for security,but the specific and relative ownership,which is only used for the purpose of security.The"third party in good faith"that the title retention cannot be antagonized without registration can be determined by referring to the rules of publicity of chattel mortgage registration.Ordinary creditors who do not take the chattel with title retention of the seller as the subject matter of the transaction do not fall within the scope of the"third party".关键词
民法典/所有权保留/动产担保/登记对抗主义/交易功能主义/善意第三人Key words
Civil Code/title retention/chattel guarantee/registration antagonism/transaction functionalism/third party in good faith分类
社会科学引用本文复制引用
陶为婕..《民法典》中所有权保留公示规则之解释论[J].沈阳工业大学学报（社会科学版）,2023,16(6):584-592,9.基金项目
国家社会科学基金项目(20BFX102). （20BFX102）
