分子影像学杂志2024，Vol.47Issue(1)：78-82,5.DOI:10.12122/j.issn.1674-4500.2024.01.14
单、双期CT增强甲状腺结节诊断价值比较
Comparison of single and dual phase of enhanced CT diagnostic values in thyroid nodules
张海涛 1柏劲松 1舒圣婕 2张驰 1朱倩 1黄景怡 1王海涛 1肖康1
作者信息
- 1. 汉中市人民医院放射影像中心,陕西 汉中 723000
- 2. 哈尔滨医科大学第二附属医院影像科,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150000
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
Objective To compare the diagnostic value of single and dual phase of enhanced CT in thyroid nodules,and explore the best scanning scheme.Methods A total of 171 nodules in 153 patients were included from January 2020 to June 2022 according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.Image sequence with a delay of 50 seconds was taken for diagnosis in the group of single phase of enhanced CT,then image sequences with a delay of 25 and 50 seconds were taken for diagnosis in the group of dual phase of enhanced CT.Diagnostic accuracy of benign and malignant thyroid nodules,characteristics of thyroid nodules,positive lymph node and enhanced CT features of thyroid nodules in two scanning schemes were the main evaluation indicators.Results There was no statistical significance in diagnostic accuracy of benign and malignant thyroid nodules between single and dual phase of enhanced CT.There was no statistical significance in edge,morphology,capsule,density,calcification and lymph node of thyroid nodules between two scanning scheme.There was no statistical significance in different densities of benign and malignant thyroid nodules between two scanning scheme.There was no statistical significance in enhancement mode of benign and malignant thyroid nodules in dual phase of enhanced CT.Conclusion There is no significant difference in the diagnostic value of single and dual phase of enhanced CT in thyroid nodules,and single phase of enhanced CT would be more suitable for clinical promotion and application by its lower radiation dose.关键词
甲状腺结节/CT增强期相/诊断价值/计算机体层成像Key words
thyroid nodule/phase of CT enhancement/diagnostic value/computed tomography引用本文复制引用
张海涛,柏劲松,舒圣婕,张驰,朱倩,黄景怡,王海涛,肖康..单、双期CT增强甲状腺结节诊断价值比较[J].分子影像学杂志,2024,47(1):78-82,5.
