|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|河北法学|平台用工关系中的"经济从属性":形成机理、外在表征与司法因应

平台用工关系中的"经济从属性":形成机理、外在表征与司法因应OACHSSCD

The"Economic Dependence"in Platform Employment Relations:Formation Mechanism,External Representation,and Judicial Response

中文摘要英文摘要

数字经济革新劳动用工形式,经济从属性标准的解释功能弱化,已不足以支撑司法机关定性平台劳动关系,导致平台与劳动者之间劳动关系的司法确认陷入困窘,新近颁布的"典型案例"中"个案分析"或"综合认定"标准亦难以一锤定音.平台关系经济从属性的形成机理在于平台对生产资料,即数据信息与算法技术的占有与控制,这就决定了平台有权管控、分解劳动者的劳动过程,致使平台劳动者在控制支配之下从事片面性劳动.流量作为平台劳动的主要劳动产品由平台独占,平台劳动者并不对其享有所有权.平台用工关系的经济从属性应表征数字社会平台劳动特点,以"生产资料依赖性"学说为逻辑起点,以马克思劳动价值基本理论为指引,解锁更为一致、有效的司法因应方案.

The digital economy has innovated the form of labor employment,and the explanatory function of the standard of the"economic dependence"has weakened,which is no longer sufficient to support the judicial authorities in qualitative analysis of platform labor relations,leading to a dilemma in judicial confirmation of labor relations between platforms and workers.The recently issued"typical cases"in the"case analysis"or"comprehensive identification"standards are also difficult to determine.The formation mechanism of the subordinate attributes of platform relationship economy lies in the possession and control of production materials,namely data information and algorithm technology,by the platform.This determines that the platform has the right to control and decompose the process of laboring,causing platform workers to engage in one-sided labor under control and domination.The economic dependence of platform employment relations should characterize the characteristics of digital society platform labor,starting from the theory of"dependence on means of production"and guided by Marx's basic theory of labor value,unlocking more consistent and effective judicial response plans.

丁亮;张天

东北林业大学文法学院,黑龙江哈尔滨 150040

政治法律

平台用工经济从属性司法因应劳动价值论

platform employmenteconomic subordinationjudicial responselabor value theory

《河北法学》 2024 (001)

114-131 / 18

2022年度法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目"基层治理中'数字公民'权利的法治保障研究"(22SFB5010)的阶段性成果.

10.16494/j.cnki.1002-3933.2024.01.007

评论