|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|太平洋学报|从"数据隐私框架"看欧美数据跨境流动的规则博弈

从"数据隐私框架"看欧美数据跨境流动的规则博弈OA北大核心CHSSCD

A View of Conflict and Coordination of Cross-border Data Flow between the EU and the U.S.through Data Privacy Framework

中文摘要英文摘要

欧美《隐私盾协议》失效后,双方为了恢复数据跨境流动秩序,于2022 年底达成了"数据隐私框架".该框架旨在回应欧盟法院在"《隐私盾协议》无效案"中提出的主要关切.2023 年 7月,欧盟委员会基于该框架对美国的个人数据保护水平发布了充分性认定决议.然而,该框架并未对美国情报机构大规模收集数据与窥探隐私的行为施加实质性限制.此外,框架建立的双层救济机制由于缺乏独立性,也无法给数据隐私权益受损的欧盟公民提供充分有效的救济.与《隐私盾协议》相比,该框架在本质上并没有明显的突破.欧盟和美国在双方数据跨境流动制度安排上的博弈,表面上是两种数据保护理念和治理模式的碰撞,实际上反映出了欧盟实施"数字主权"战略与美国维护"数字霸权"地位之间存在的根本利益冲突.欧美凭借各自优势,在数字经济时代争夺全球数字治理话语权.通过深入研究欧美之间关于"数据隐私框架"的规则博弈,可以为我国在选择适合本土的数据监管模式和提升数据治理规则话语权方面提供重要的思考和启示.

After the invalidation of the Privacy Shield,the EU and the U.S.established the Data Privacy Framework in late 2022 to restore the order of cross-border data flow between them.The Data Privacy Framework was designed to address the main concerns raised by the Court of Justice of the European Union(CJEU)in the Schrems Ⅱ case,and the European Commission issued a decision on the adequate level of protection of personal data based on the framework in July 2023.However,the Data Privacy Framework has failed to impose significant constraints on the capabilities of the U.S.intelligence agencies to conduct large-scale data collection and mass surveillance.Additionally,the two-tier relief mechanism does not provide ad-equate and effective relief to the EU citizens whose data privacy rights are violated in the U.S.due to a lack of independence.In fact,the Data Privacy Framework doesn't make an essential breakthrough compared to the Privacy Shield.On the surface,the divergence in the arrangement of the cross-border data flow between the EU and the U.S.is a collision of two different concepts and governance models of data protection,re-flecting the fundamental conflict of interest between the European digital sovereignty and the U.S.mainte-nance of digital hegemony.The two sides are competing for the right to speak on global data governance in the era of digital economy by virtue of their respective advantages.The competition between the EU and the U.S.over the Data Privacy Framework offers valuable insights for China in selecting an appropriate model of data supervision and enhancing its influence in the field of rules of data governance.

单文华;邓娜

西安交通大学,陕西 西安 710049

政治法律

《隐私盾协议》数据跨境流动"数据隐私框架"充分性认定决议数字主权数字霸权

Privacy Shieldcross-border data flowData Privacy Frameworkdigital sovereigntydigital hegemony

《太平洋学报》 2024 (001)

44-56 / 13

本文系国家社科基金重点项目"境外投资保护和促进法律问题研究"(21AZD065)的阶段性研究成果.

10.14015/j.cnki.1004-8049.2024.01.004

评论