|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|肿瘤预防与治疗|不同束流模式对肺癌中等分割容积旋转调强放射治疗剂量学的影响

不同束流模式对肺癌中等分割容积旋转调强放射治疗剂量学的影响OACSTPCD

Dosimetry of Medium-Fractionated Volume Rotary Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Lung Cancer with Different Beam Modes

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:研究在肺癌中等剂量分割放射治疗中,不同束流模式对容积旋转调强(volumetric modulated arc therapy,VMAT)计划剂量学的影响,为临床束流模式的选择提供参考.方法:选取 12 例肺癌患者,均采用VMAT技术进行 3 个部分弧设计有均整器(flattening filter,FF)模式和无均整器(flattening filter free,FFF)模式两组治疗计划,比较两组计划的靶区和危及器官剂量学参数、跳数、机架最小旋转速度、优化时间.结果:两组ITVs[计划内靶区(internal target volume,ITVs)+转移淋巴结]的D98%、Dmean、适形度指数(conformity index,CI)、均匀性指数(homogeneity index,HI)和计划靶区(planning target volume,PTV)的D98%、HI剂量学参数的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);ITVs的D2%和PTV的D2%、Dmean、CI剂量学参数的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),FFF模式组ITVs的D2%、Dmean均低于FF模式组,PTV的CI优于FF模式组.两组计划在双肺的V5 和健侧肺的V5、Dmean,心脏的V40 和V30,食管的D1cc、V30 和气管的D1cc、V30、Dmean,脊髓的Dmax,剂量学参数的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);FFF模式组双肺的V30、V20、Dmean和患侧肺的V30、V20、V5、Dmean,心脏的Dmean低于FF模式且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但食管的Dmean高于FF模式组且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).FFF模式组跳数、机架最小旋转速度、优化时间均高于FF模式组且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:两组计划均能满足临床要求,FFF模式对肺部的保护更好,尤其是患侧肺.FFF模式的跳数虽然高于FF模式,但机架最小旋转速度FFF模式更高,因此FFF模式执行效率更高.对于肺癌中等剂量分割治疗计划,可优先选择FFF模式.

Objective:To study the effect of different beam modes on planned dosimetry of volumetric modulated arc therapy(VMAT)in medium-dose fractionated radiotherapy for lung cancer.Methods:Twelve patients with lung cancer were selected,and three partial arc treatment plans were designed flattening filter(FF)model and flattening filter free(FFF)model using VMAT technology.The dosimetric parameters of target and organs at risk,monitor unit,minimum gantry rotation speed and optimization time obtained with the two plans were compared.Results:There were no significant differences in the dosimetry parameters of D98%of ITVs[internal target volume(ITV)+lymph node metastasis],Dmean,CI,D98%of HI and PTV between the two groups(P>0.05).The difference in dosimetric parameters of D2%of ITVs and D2%of PTV,Dmean and CI were statistically significant(P<0.05).The Dmean and D2%of FFF mode were lower than FF mode,while the CI of PTV mode was better than FF mode.The differences in the dosimetric parameters of the two lungs V5 and the healthy lung V5 and Dmean,the heart V40 and V30,the esophagus D1cc,V30 and the trachea D1cc,V30 and Dmean,and the spinal cord Dmax were not statistically significant(P>0.05).In FFF mode,V30,V20,Dmean of both lungs,V30,V20,V5,Dmean of the affected lung,and Dmean of the heart were significantly lower than those in FF mode and the difference(P<0.05),while Dmean of the esophagus was significantly higher than that in FF mode(P<0.05).Besides,the monitor unit,minimum rotation speed and optimization time in FFF mode were significantly higher than those in FF mode(P<0.05).Conclusion:Both models can meet the clinical requirements.FFF model has better protection for lungs,especially the affected lung.Although the monitor unit of FFF model is higher than that of FF model,the minimum rotation speed of the gantry is higher in FFF model,which guaranteed a higher execution efficiency for FFF model.The FFF model may be preferred for the medium-dose fractiation treatment plan for lung cancer.

孙斌;钟思瑶;南贤秀;徐程;高玉艳

101100 北京,首都医科大学附属北京潞河医院 放疗科

临床医学

中等分割容积旋转调强均整器

MediumfractionatedVolumetric modulated arc therapyFlattening filter

《肿瘤预防与治疗》 2024 (002)

149-155 / 7

This study was supported by grants from Beijing Luhe Hosiptal(No.LHYY2021-LC07). 首都医科大学附属北京潞河医院青年科研孵育专项(编号:LHYY2021-LC07)

10.3969/j.issn.1674-0904.2024.02.007

评论