|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|肿瘤预防与治疗|双能量CT虚拟平扫在颈部扫描中的应用价值

双能量CT虚拟平扫在颈部扫描中的应用价值OACSTPCD

Application Value of Virtual Non-contrast Dual-Energy CT in Neck CT Examination

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:探讨双能量CT(dual-energy computed tomography,DECT)虚拟平扫(virtual non-contrast,VNC)在颈部扫描中的图像质量和辐射剂量.方法:回顾性收集 49 例行颈部常规平扫(true non-contrast,TNC)+DECT增强扫描的患者,利用后处理软件得到VNC图像.对比TNC和VNC图像的客观图像质量[不同组织(颌下腺、甲状腺、胸锁乳突肌、颈内静脉、脂肪、颈椎椎体、气管气体)的CT值、噪声和信噪比(signal-to-noise ratio,SNR)]和主观评分.并比较TNC +增强扫描与单独增强扫描的辐射剂量[容积CT剂量指数(volume CT dose index,CTDIvol)、剂量长度乘积(dose length product,DLP)、有效剂量(effective dose,ED)].结果:VNC和TNC图像颌下腺、颈内静脉、胸锁乳突肌、气管气体的CT值差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);VNC图像甲状腺、颈椎椎体的CT值低于TNC,而脂肪的CT值高于TNC,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).VNC的噪声[(2.80±1.28)HU]与TNC[(2.60±0.79)HU]相比,差异无统计学意义(t =-0.901,P>0.05).VNC的SNR(25.14±9.85)与TNC(26.36±9.46)相比,差异无统计学意义(t = 0.630,P>0.05).单独双能量增强扫描的CTDIvol[(7.48±0.33)mGy]、DLP[(194.06±22.90)mGy.cm]和ED[(0.41±0.05)mSv]明显低于TNC+双能量增强扫描[(19.67±1.21)mGy、(503.82±66.11)mGy.cm、(1.06±0.14)mSv],差异均有统计学意义(t = 68.808、31.308、31.308,均P<0.05).结论:VNC在颈部扫描中可获得与TNC大致相当的图像质量,且能明显降低患者的辐射剂量.

Objective:To explore the image quality and radiation dose of virtual non-contrast(VNC)dual-energy CT(DECT)in neck CT examination.Methods:A total of 49 patients who underwent true non-contrast(TNC)DECT were retrospectively collect-ed.Objective image quality(submandibular gland,thyroid gland,sternocleidomastoid muscle,internal jugular vein,fat,cervical vertebra and tracheal gas),noise,signal-to-noise ratio(SNR),and subjective score were compared between TNC and VNC images.The radiation dose including volume CT dose index(CTDIvol),dose length product(DLP)and effective dose(ED)were com-pared between TNC DECT and single DECT.Results:No signif-icant differences in CT values of submandibular gland,internal jugular vein,sternocleidomastoid muscle and tracheal gas were found between VNC and TNC images(all P>0.05).Compared with TNC image,the CT values of thyroid gland and cervical vertebra in VNC image was significantly lower,while the CT value of fat in VNC image was significantly higher(all P<0.05).There were no signif-icant differences between VNC and TNC in noise[(2.80±1.28)HU vs(2.60±0.79)HU,t =-0.901,P>0.05]and SNR(25.14±9.85 vs 26.36±9.46,t = 0.630,P>0.05).DECT was significantly lower than TNC DECT in CTDIvol[(7.48±0.33)mGy vs(19.67±1.21)mGy,t = 68.808,P<0.05],DLP[(194.06±22.90)mGy.cm vs(503.82±66.11)mGy.cm,t = 31.308,P<0.05]and ED[(0.41±0.05)mSv vs(1.06±0.14)mSv),t = 31.308,P<0.05].Conclusion:VNC imaging can guarantee approx-imately comparable image quality as TNC imaging,and reduce the radiation dose of neck DECT.

马月;何长久;胡仕北;周鹏;林礼波;胡云涛;李齐远

610041 成都,四川省肿瘤临床医学研究中心,四川省肿瘤医院·研究所,四川省癌症防治中心,电子科技大学附属肿瘤医院 影像科

临床医学

双能量CT虚拟平扫常规平扫图像质量辐射剂量

Dual-energy CTVirtual non-contrast imagingTrue non-contrast imagingImage qualityRadiation dose

《肿瘤预防与治疗》 2024 (002)

156-161 / 6

This study was supported by grants from Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province(No.2021YFS0225). 四川省科技计划重点研发项目(编号:2021YFS0225)

10.3969/j.issn.1674-0904.2024.02.008

评论