无心脑血管疾病危险因素成年受检者颈动脉管腔结构变化的相关因素分析OA北大核心CSTPCD
Analysis of related factors of changes in carotid artery structure in adults without cardio and cerebrovascular disease risk factors
目的 分析无心脑血管疾病危险因素成年受检者颈动脉管腔结构变化及其影响因素.方法 回顾性连续纳入2019 年12 月至2021 年12 月多中心"脑卒中高危人群筛查脑颈动脉超声规范化评分"数据库2 738 例无心脑血管疾病相关危险因素的成年受检者(男787 例,女1 951例),分别将男性、女性分为18~29、30~39、40~49、50~59、≥60 岁5 组,统计比较各年龄组间颈动脉内-中膜厚度(IMT)、颈总动脉内径(DCCA)、颈动脉球部内径(DBULB)、颈内动脉内径(DICA)及颈动脉不同节段内径之比[以颈动脉指数(CI)表示,CIBULB/CCA为DBULB/DCCA,CIBULB/ICA为DBULB/DICA,CIICA/CCA为DICA/DCCA]的差异性,并采用Spearman相关性分析及单因素线性回归方法分析各参数随年龄的变化情况.采用单因素分析比较男女间以及不同侧别间各CI的差异,采用Spearman相关性分析方法分析各CI与颈总动脉IMT的相关性.应用多因素线性回归方法分析CIBULB/CCA、CIBULB/ICA及CIICA/CCA变化的影响因素.结果 (1)IMT、DCCA、DBULB、DICA、CIBULB/CCA及CIBULB/ICA与年龄呈显著正相关性(男性r值分别为0.121、0.229、0.260、0.055、0.107、0.229,女性r值分别为0.364、0.185、0.199、0.073、0.077、0.129,均P<0.01),CIICA/CCA与年龄呈负相关性(男性r =-0.118,女性r =-0.049,均P<0.05),且年龄每增长1 岁,男性IMT、DCCA、DBULB、DICA分别增长0.003、0.015、0.025、0.004 mm,女性IMT、DCCA、DBULB、DICA分别增长0.005、0.011、0.018、0.005 mm.(2)男性CIBULB/ICA小于女性(1.47±0.21 比1.51±0.22;t =-5.566,P<0.01),CIICA/CCA大于女性(0.78±0.11 比0.76±0.11;t =6.629,P<0.01);左侧CIBULB/CCA(1.14±0.15 比1.13±0.15;t =-2.973,P<0.05)、CIICA/CCA(0.77±0.11 比0.76±0.11;t =-3.946,P<0.01)大于右侧.男女性别之间CIBULB/CCA及左右侧之间CIBULB/ICA差异均无统计学意义(男性比女性:1.13±0.15 比1.13±0.15,t =1.212,P =0.226;左侧比右侧:1.49±0.22 比1.50±0.21,t = 1.112,P =0.266).CIBULB/CCA、CIBULB/ICA与IMT的增加呈正相关性(r值分别为0.039、0.070,均P<0.05),而CIICA/CCA与IMT的增加呈负相关性(r =-0.032,P<0.05).(3)多因素线性回归分析结果显示,年龄(β =0.081,P<0.01)、左侧(β =0.040,P<0.05)显著正向预测CIBULB/CCA,而IMT对CIBULB/CCA的影响差异无统计学意义(β =0.012,P>0.05).年龄(β =0.148,P<0.01)、女性(β= 0.070,P<0.01)及IMT(β =0.030,P<0.05)为CIBULB/ICA增加的独立影响因素.年龄(β =-0.063,P<0.01)、女性(β =-0.088,P<0.01)显著负向预测CIICA/CCA,左侧显著正向预测CIICA/CCA(β = 0.053,P<0.01),但IMT对CIICA/CCA的影响差异无统计学意义(β =-0.022,P>0.05).结论 无心脑血管疾病危险因素成年受检者的颈动脉管腔结构参数与年龄具有一定的相关性,年龄、性别、侧别及IMT为颈动脉内径比值变化的独立预测因素.
Objective To analyze the changes of carotid artery structures and their influencing factors among the adults without cardio and cerebrovascular disease risk factors.Methods All 2 738 adult subjects(787 males and 1 951 females)without cardio and cerebrovascular disease risk factors were continuously included in the national multi-center Standardized Brain-Carotid Ultrasound Evaluation Database from December 2019 to December 2021.Males and females were divided into 5 groups of 18-29 years old,30-39 years old,40-49 years old,50-59 years old,and≥60 years old respectively,and the intima-media thickness(IMT),the diameter of common carotid artery(DCCA),carotid artery bulb(DBULB),internal carotid artery(DICA),and the ratio of diameters of different segments carotid artery index(CI;CIBULB/CCA[DBULB/DCCA],CIBULB/ICA[DBULB/DICA]and CIICA/CCA[DICA/DCCA])were counted and compared for each group.The Spearman correlation coefficient and univariate linear regression analysis were used to analyze the changes of each parameter with age.The univariate linear regression analysis was used to compare the difference of CI between female and male,and left side and right side.The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between CI and carotid artery IMT.The multiple regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of CIBULB/CCA,CIBULB/ICA and CIICA/CCA.Results(1)IMT,DCCA,DBULB,DICA,CIBULB/CCA and CIBULB/ICA were significantly positively correlated with age(r-values for males were 0.121,0.229,0.260,0.055,0.107,0.229,respectively,for females were 0.364,0.185,0.199,0.073,0.077,0.129,respectively,all P<0.01),and CIICA/CCA was negatively correlated with age(males:r =-0.118,females:r =-0.049,all P<0.05).For every 1 year increase of age,the IMT,DCCA,DBULB and DICA in males increased by 0.003 mm,0.015 mm,0.025 mm,0.004 mm respectively,and 0.005 mm,0.011 mm,0.018 mm,0.005 mm in females respectively.(2)The CIBULB/ICA in males were lower than female(1.47±0.21 vs.1.51±0.22;t =-5.566,P<0.01)and CIICA/CCA were higher than female(0.78±0.11 vs.0.76±0.11;t =6.629,P<0.01);the CIBULB/CCA(1.14±0.15 vs.1.13±0.15;t =-2.973,P<0.05)and CIICA/CCA(0.77±0.11 vs.0.76±0.11;t =-3.946,P<0.01)on left were higher than that on the right.However,there was no significant difference in CIBULB/CCA between the two sexes and CIBULB/ICA between left and right(males vs.females:1.13±0.15 vs.1.13±0.15,t =1.212,P =0.226;left vs.right:1.49±0.22 vs.1.50±0.21,t =1.112,P =0.266).CIBULB/CCA and CIBULB/ICA were positively correlated with IMT(r =0.039 and 0.070,respectively,both P<0.05),and CIICA/CCA was negatively correlated with IMT(r =-0.032,P<0.05).(3)The results of multiple regression analysis shows that age(β =0.081,P<0.01)and left(β =0.040,P<0.05)positively predicted CIBULB/CCA,while IMT could not predict CIBULB/CCA(β =0.012,P>0.05).Age(β =0.148,P<0.01),female(β =0.070,P<0.01)and IMT(β =0.030,P<0.05)were independent factors of the CIBULB/ICA increase.Age(β=-0.063,P<0.01)and female(β =-0.088,P<0.01)predicted CIICA/CCA negatively,and the left predicted CIICA/CCA positively(β =0.053,P<0.01),but IMT had no significant effect on CIICA/CCA(β=-0.022,P>0.05).Conclusions The structural parameters of carotid artery in adults without risk factors for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases were correlated with age.And age,gender,lateral and IMT were independent predictors of carotid artery index.
全雪萌;华扬;贾凌云;马兆毅;脑卒中高危人群筛查脑颈动脉规范化评估数据库课题组
100053 北京,首都医科大学宣武医院血管超声科国家卫生健康委能力建设和继续教育中心
超声检查颈动脉结构心脑血管疾病危险因素
UltrasonographyCarotid arteryStructureRisk factors of cardiac cerebrovascular diseases
《中国脑血管病杂志》 2024 (002)
93-101 / 9
国家卫生健康委能力建设和继续教育中心多中心课题资助项目
评论