高校决策咨询类科研成果认定与奖励制度的调查分析OACHSSCDCSTPCD

[Purpose/significance]The aim of this paper is to gain a deeper understanding of the progress and existing problems in the reform of the evaluation system for decision-making consulting achievements in univer-sities,and to provide materials for the continuous deepening of the reform.[Method/process]Using the network survey method,policy text analysis method,and theoretical analysis method,a systematic analysis is conducted on the corresponding policy texts of 30 undergraduate universities.The progress of reform practices is mastered.[Result/conclusion]The investigation found that there are six prominent issues as follows:Inconsistent evaluation objects,single evaluation subject composition,single evaluation methods,incomplete evaluation standard system,overly rigid signature requirements,and narrow application scope of results.Corresponding improvement mea-sures have been proposed to address the existing problems.In response to the problems existing in the research university system,six corresponding improvement measures have been proposed:Moderately expanding the scope of decision-making and consulting scientific research achievements recognition,improving the user-centered or-ganizational system for evaluating achievements,improving evaluation methods based on evaluation purposes,improving the evaluation standard system guided by quality innovation and actual contribution,and abolishing the"first"signature restriction on high-level special decision-making and consulting scientific research achievements moderately expanding the application scope of recognized achievements.