|国家科技期刊平台

地下水超采综合治理效益评价OACSTPCD

Evaluation of Benefits of Comprehensive Management of Groundwater Over-exploitation

中文摘要英文摘要

地下水超采综合治理是加强新时代生态文明建设、保障国家水安全的重大决策部署,是打基础、利长远的战略性工程.其治理效益关乎着治理工作推进的有效性,是衡量地下水超采综合治理水平的关键.为定量评价地下水超采区综合治理效益,以"八大准则"为框架,以 18 项必选指标、12 项备选指标为基础,构建了基于"目标-准则-指标"的多层级地下水超采综合治理效益评价体系;结合层次分析法和熵权法确定指标权重,采用"单指标量化-多指标综合-多准则集成"的方法计算地下水超采综合治理效益指数(GGI),定量评价了地下水超采综合治理水平,并对河南省滑县、内黄县、汤阴县开展地下水超采综合治理效益评价实例研究.结果表明:滑县、内黄县、汤阴县的地下水超采综合治理效益指数的等级均为良好,主要制约因素为地下水水位变化幅度、地下水水质达标情况、水文化传承载体数量.基于该研究结果提出多渠道增加水源供给、优化农业种植结构、改造升级企业生产工艺、加大宣传和教育力度等改善措施.经实例验证,所提出的地下水超采综合治理效益评价体系能真实反映地下水超采综合治理的工作效果,可为地下水超采综合治理提供参考依据.

Comprehensive management of over-exploitation of groundwater is a major decision-making deployment to strengthen the construction of ecological civilization in the new era and safeguard national water security,and it is a strate-gic project to lay a foundation for long-term benefits.The effectiveness of its governance is related to the effectiveness of the advancement of the governance work,which is the key to measure the level of comprehensive governance of groundwater overdraft.In order to quantitatively evaluate the comprehensive management benefit of groundwater over-exploitation area,a multi-level evaluation system of ″target,criterion,and index″ was constructed based on the ″eight criteria″ and 18 required indicators and 12 alternative indicators.Combined with analytic hierarchy process(AHP)and entropy weight method to de-termine the index weight,the method of ″single index quantification,multi-index synthesis,multi-criteria integration″ is ap-plied to calculate the comprehensive governance benefit Index(GGI)of groundwater over-exploitation.The comprehensive treatment level of groundwater overextraction was quantitatively evaluated,and the case study of comprehensive treatment benefit evaluation of groundwater overextraction was carried out in Hua County,Neihuang County and Tangyin County of Henan Province.The results are as follows.The comprehensive benefit index of groundwater over-exploitation in Hua County,Neihuang County and Tangyin County is sound.The main restricting factors are the change amplitude of groundwater level,the standard of groundwater quality and the number of carriers of water culture inheritance.Based on the results of the study,the author puts forward some improvement measures such as increasing water supply through multiple channels,optimizing agricultural planting structure,reforming and upgrading production technology of enterprises,and strengthening publicity and education.The results show that the evaluation system can truly reflect the effect of comprehensive treatment of ground-water over-exploitation,and can provide reference for comprehensive treatment of groundwater over-exploitation.

魏怀斌;赵士威;刘静;张丽莉

华北水利水电大学 管理与经济学院,河南 郑州 450046华北水利水电大学 水利学院,河南 郑州 450046华北水利水电大学 水资源学院,河南 郑州 450046||河南省黄河流域水资源节约集约利用重点实验室,河南 郑州 450046沧州市水利工程质量技术中心,河北 沧州 061000

水利科学

地下水综合治理效益评价评价体系评价指标评价方法

comprehensive management of groundwaterbenefit evaluationevaluation systemevaluation indexevalua-tion method

《华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版)》 2024 (003)

快速城市化地区生态水文过程演变机理及模拟调控研究

51-59 / 9

国家自然科学基金项目(51979107).

10.19760/j.ncwu.zk.2024029

评论