噪声干扰的相位误差与相位展开可靠性研究OA北大核心CSTPCD
Research on phase error and phase unwrapping reliability of noise interference
为了比较几种3维重建方法的优劣,采用一种评价方法进行理论分析和实验验证,建立了条纹噪声干扰的包裹相位误差模型,求出包裹相位误差的最大方差,然后对3种经典的双频相位展开算法的相位展开可靠性进行了分析和对比.结果表明,双频四步相移算法4fh+4fl的抗干扰能力最强,其重建物体表面平滑无褶皱;其次是3fh+3fl算法,其相位误差数量为4fh+4fl的169.7%和126.9%;3ifh+2fl算法重建面形存在大量褶痕,测量精度最差;3fh+2fl算法的相位误差数量为4f1h+4fl的442.6%和388.8%,但相比于4fh+4fl算法和3fh+3fl算法,测量效率提升了 37.5%和16.6%.该研究为评价各双频相移法的优劣提供了一种方法,并为以上3种算法的选择提供了参考.
In order to compare the advantages and disadvantages of several 3-D reconstruction methods,an evaluation method was adoped for theoretical analysis and experimental verification.The wrapped phase error model of fringe noise interference was established,and the maximum variance of the wrapped phase error was obtained.Then the reliability of three classical dual-frequency phase unwrapping algorithms was analyzed and compared.The results show that the dual-frequency four-step phase-shifting algorithm 4fh+4fl has the strongest anti-interference ability,and its reconstructed object surface is smooth and wrinkle-free.The second is the 3fh+3f algorithm,whose phase errors are 169.7%and 126.9%of those of 4fh+4fl.Finally,the 3fh+2f algorithm has a large number of folds on the reconstructed shapes,and the measurement accuracy is the worst.The phase errors of the 3fh+2f algorithm are 442.6%and 388.8%of those of the 4fh+4fl algorithm.However,compared with the 4fh+4fl algorithm and the 3fh+3fl algorithm,the measurement efficiency is improved by 37.5%and 16.6%.This study provides a method to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each dual-frequency phase shift method and provides a reference for the selection of the above three methods.
刘锦涛;徐鹏;王建华;解静
青岛理工大学信息与控制工程学院,青岛 266520,中国
计算机与自动化
光栅噪声相位误差相位展开可靠性
gratingsnoisephase errorphase unwrapping reliability
《激光技术》 2024 (002)
240-248 / 9
山东省自然科学基金资助项目(ZR2021MF024)
评论