| 注册
首页|期刊导航|兰州大学学报(医学版)|瑞马唑仑在纤维支气管镜检查中有效性与安全性的荟萃分析

瑞马唑仑在纤维支气管镜检查中有效性与安全性的荟萃分析

许云鹏 周家来 郑家怡 李红瑞 郭鸿 刘健

兰州大学学报(医学版)2024,Vol.50Issue(1):61-66,6.
兰州大学学报(医学版)2024,Vol.50Issue(1):61-66,6.DOI:10.13885/j.issn.1000-2812.2024.01.009

瑞马唑仑在纤维支气管镜检查中有效性与安全性的荟萃分析

Safety and efficacy of remimazolam in fiberoptic bronchoscopy:A Meta-analysis

许云鹏 1周家来 2郑家怡 1李红瑞 1郭鸿 3刘健4

作者信息

  • 1. 兰州大学 第一临床医学院,甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 2. 兰州大学 第二临床医学院,甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 3. 兰州大学第一医院 重症医学科,甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 4. 兰州大学 第一临床医学院,甘肃 兰州 730000||甘肃省妇幼保健院(甘肃省中心医院),甘肃 兰州 730070
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To systematically evaluate the differences in safety and effectiveness between remima-zolam and propofol in fiberoptic bronchoscopy.Methods A computerized search was conducted in databases including PubMed,Embase,Cochrane,Web of Science,China National Knowledge Infrastructure,Wanfang Data,China Biomedical Database and VIP Database,covering all records up to June 2023.A meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.4 software.Results Out of 137 initially identified publications,6 studies meet-ing the criteria were included in the final analysis.The meta-analysis showed no significant difference be-tween propofol and remimazolam in terms of anesthesia induction time(MD = 0.35,95%CI:[-0.07,0.77],P = 0.1),anesthesia recovery time(MD = 1.29,95%CI:[-1.35,3.94],P = 0.34),examination duration(MD =-0.66,95%CI:[-1.58,0.26],P = 0.16)and anesthesia satisfaction(MD =-0.13,95%CI:[-0.46,0.20],P = 0.43).Compared with propofol,remimazolam showed a decrease in heart rate(MD = 3.75,95%CI:[0.57,6.92],P = 0.02),systolic blood pressure(MD = 18.21,95%CI:[6.24,30.17],P = 0.003)and diastolic pressure difference(MD = 12.13,95%CI:[6.19,18.07],P<0.000 1)before and after anesthesia induction.No signifi-cant difference was found between the two groups in the mean arterial pressure before and after anesthesia in-duction(MD =-0.91,95%CI:[-28.04,26.22],P = 0.95).Compared with propofol,the incidence of hypoten-sion in the remimazolam group was lower(OR = 0.31,95%CI:[0.21,0.47],P<0.0001).And there was no sig-nificant difference in the overall adverse reactions(OR = 0.21,95%CI:[0.04,1.12],P = 0.07),injection pain(OR = 0.10,95%CI:[0.01,1.72],P = 0.11),respiratory depression(OR = 0.50,95%CI:[0.06,3.83],P = 0.50),nausea and vomiting(OR =0.98,95%CI:[0.11,8.94],P = 0.98),bradycardia and physical movement(OR = 0.62,95%CI:[0.21,1.90],P = 0.41;OR =1.79,95%CI:[0.51,6.23],P = 0.36)between the two groups.Con-clusion In bronchoscopy,remimazolam and propofol are equally effective,with the former showing more sta-ble hemodynamics and a lower incidence of adverse reactions.

关键词

瑞马唑仑/丙泊酚纤维支气管镜检查/安全性/有效性/Meta分析/麻醉/不良反应

Key words

Remimazolam/propofolfiber Bronchoscope/safety/efficacy/Meta-analysis/anesthesia/adverse reactions

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

许云鹏,周家来,郑家怡,李红瑞,郭鸿,刘健..瑞马唑仑在纤维支气管镜检查中有效性与安全性的荟萃分析[J].兰州大学学报(医学版),2024,50(1):61-66,6.

基金项目

国家重点研发资助项目(2022YFC2504505) (2022YFC2504505)

中国卫生信息与健康医疗大数据学会资助项目(Z-2019-1-002) (Z-2019-1-002)

甘肃省重点研发资助项目(20YF8FA082) (20YF8FA082)

甘肃省中医药科研资助项目(GZKP-2021-27) (GZKP-2021-27)

兰州大学第一医院院内基金资助项目(ldyyyn2019-66) (ldyyyn2019-66)

兰州大学学生创新创业行动计划资助项目(20230060168) (20230060168)

兰州大学学报(医学版)

OACSTPCD

2097-681X

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文