重复经颅磁刺激联合认知训练治疗脑卒中后认知障碍疗效Meta分析OA北大核心CSTPCD
Clinical Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Cognitive Training on Patients with Post Stroke Cognitive Impairment:A Meta-Analysis
目的 通过Meta分析评价重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)联合认知训练治疗脑卒中后认知障碍(PSCI)患者的疗效.方法 计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库(Wangfang Data)、维普中文期刊全文数据库(VIP)等数据库中有关rTMS联合认知训练治疗PSCI患者的临床随机对照试验(RCTs),检索时间为建库至2023年6月.主要结局指标包括蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)、简易智力状态检查量表(MMSE)、日常生活活动能力量表(ADL)、行为记忆测验法(RBMT)评分.由2名评审员使用Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具评估文献质量,使用RevMan 5.4软件进行Meta分析.计数资料采用比值比(OR)或相对风险比(RR)表示;计量资料采用均数差(MD)或标准化均数差(SMD)表示,并计算其95%置信区间(CI).根据I 2和P值大小判断异质性,若P≥0.10,I 2≤50%,使用固定效应模型;若P<0.10,I 2>50%,则使用随机效应模型.结果 共纳入23项研究,1 788例患者,其中对照组895例、试验组893例.① MoCA评分:按对照组不同治疗方法进行亚组分析结果显示,试验组MoCA评分均明显高于对照组[MD=1.78,95%CI(1.18,2.38),P<0.000 1;MD=3.30,95%CI(3.01,3.58),P<0.000 01];按刺激频率进行亚组分析结果显示,试验组MoCA评分均高于对照组[MD=3.49,95%CI(3.40,3.57),P<0.000 01;MD=3.16,95%CI(2.79,3.53),P<0.000 01].② MMSE评分:试验组MMSE评分均高于对照组[MD= 2.14,95%CI(1.14,3.15),P<0.000 1;MD=3.16,95%CI(2.71,3.60),P<0.000 01].③ ADL评分:试验组ADL评分均明显高于对照组[MD=10.78,95%CI(9.18,12.38),P<0.000 01;MD=8.23,95%CI(7.04,9.41),P<0.000 01].④ RBMT评分:试验组RBMT评分高于对照组[MD=2.00,95%CI(1.37,2.63),P<0.000 01].结论 rTMS联合认知训练可改善脑卒中患者认知功能、智力状态、行为记忆能力及日常生活活动能力,值得临床推广.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS)combined with cogni-tive training on patients with post stroke cognitive impairment(PSCI)by Meta-analysis.Methods Data were searched and retrieved from the databases of PubMed,Embase,The Cochrane Library,Web of Science,China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),Wanfang Data,and Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database(VIP).The randomized controlled trials(RCTs)of rTMS combined with cognitive training for the treatment of patients with PSCI were included,and the retrieval time was from database inception to June 2023.The primary outcome measures included Montreal cognitive assessment(MoCA),mini-mental state exami-nation(MMSE),activities of daily living(ADL)scale and Rivermead behavioural memory test(RBMT).The quality of the litera-ture was assessed by two investigators using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool,and Meta-analysis was performed using Rev-Man 5.3 software.Enumeration data were expressed as odds ratio(OR)or relative risk ratio(RR).Measurement data were expressed as mean difference(MD)or standardized mean difference(SMD),with 95%confidence interval(CI).The heterogeneity was deter-mined according to the P value and I2 value.If P≥0.10 and I2≤50%,a fixed effects model would be used,and if P<0.10 and I2>50%,a random effects model would be used.Results A total of 23 RCTs with 1 788 patients were included,895 patients in the control group and 893 patients in the experimental group.(1)MoCA scores:subgroup analyses by different treatments in the control group showed that MoCA scores in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group[MD=1.78,95%CI(1.18,2.38),P<0.000 1;MD=3.30,95%CI(3.01,3.58),P<0.000 01];subgroup analyses by stimulation frequency showed that Mo-CA scores in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group[MD=3.49,95%CI(3.40,3.57),P<0.000 01;MD=3.16,95%CI(2.79,3.53),P<0.000 01].(2)MMSE score:compared with the control group,MMSE score in the ex-perimental group was higher[MD=2.14,95%CI(1.14,3.15),P<0.000 1;MD=3.16,95%CI(2.71,3.60),P<0.000 01].(3)ADL score:compared with the control group,ADL score in the experimental group was higher[MD=10.78,95%CI(9.18,12.38),P<0.000 01;MD=8.23,95%CI(7.04,9.41),P<0.000 01].(4)RBMT score:compared with the control group,RBMT score in the ex-perimental group was higher[MD=2.00,95%CI(1.37,2.63),P<0.000 01].Conclusion rTMS combined with cognitive training can improve cognitive function,intelligence state,behavioral memory ability and activities of daily living of stroke patients,which is recommended for clinical application.
刘长兴;郭心怡;常翔
黑龙江中医药大学研究生院,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150040成都中医药大学临床医学院,四川 成都 610075陕西中医药大学附属西安医院,陕西 西安 710016
脑卒中后认知障碍重复经颅磁刺激认知训练认知功能日常生活活动能力Meta分析
post stroke cognitive impairmentrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationcognitive trainingcognitive func-tionactivities of daily livingmeta-analysis
《康复学报》 2024 (002)
176-185 / 10
国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(81704131);国家中医药管理局第六批全国老中医药专家学术经验继承工作室项目(国中医药人教发[2017]29号)
评论