|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|腹腔镜外科杂志|腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合与胆道内支架引流一期缝合疗效比较的Meta分析

腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合与胆道内支架引流一期缝合疗效比较的Meta分析OACSTPCD

Meta-analysis of efficacy comparison between laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary suture and biliary drainage stenting with primary suture

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:通过Meta分析比较腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合(PS)与胆道内支架引流(BDS)+PS的临床疗效,并探讨其临床应用价值.方法:检索国内外数据库中关于腹腔镜胆总管探查(LCBDE)+PS与LCBDE+BDS+PS疗效比较的临床研究.检索时间2010 年1 月1 日至2023 年8 月1 日.观察指标包括手术时间、住院时间、术后胆漏发生率及总并发症发生率,提取相关数据后应用RevMan 5.4 软件进行Meta分析.结果:共纳入符合标准的回顾性队列研究 5 篇,文献累计样本量 611例,其中PS组 292 例、BDS+PS组 319 例.Meta分析结果显示,两组手术时间(WMD=-1.66,95%CI=-15.78~12.46,P= 0.82)、住院时间(WMD=-0.81,95%CI=-2.23~0.60,P=0.26)、残余结石率(OR=1.45,95%CI=0.24~8.83,P=0.69)、总并发症发生率(OR=1.15,95%CI=0.70~1.88,P=0.58)差异无统计学意义,PS组术后胆漏发生率(OR=3.63,95%CI=1.77~7.44,P=0.0004)高于BDS+PS组.结论:对于符合适应证的胆总管结石患者,LCBDE+BDS+PS可一定程度上降低术后胆漏发生率,是安全、有效的.

Objective:Through meta-analysis,this study compared the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct explo-ration(LCBDE)+primary suture(PS)with biliary drainage stenting(BDS)+PS and explored their clinical application value.Methods:The clinical studies comparing the efficacy of LCBDE+PS and LCBDE+BDS+PS in various databases at home and abroad were searched.The search period spanned from Jan.1,2010 to Aug.1,2023.Outcome indicators included operation time,duration of hospita-lization,incidence of postoperative bile leakage and overall complication rate.Relevant data were extracted and analyzed using RevMan 5.4 software.Results:Five retrospective cohort studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included,covering a sample size of 611 cases.There were 292 cases in the PS group,and 319 cases in the BDS+PS group.The results of the meta-analysis indicated no signifi-cant differences in operation time(WMD=-1.66,95%CI=-15.78~12.46,P=0.82),duration of hospitalization(WMD=-0.81,95%CI=-2.23~0.60,P=0.26),residual stone rate(OR=1.45,95%CI=0.24~8.83,P=0.69),and overall complication rate(OR=1.15,95%CI=0.70~1.88,P=0.58)between the two groups.However,the incidence of postoperative bile leakage(OR= 3.63,95%CI=1.77~7.44,P=0.0004)was higher in the PS group than that in the BDS+PS group.Conclusions:For choledocholi-thiasis patients who meet the indications,LCBDE+BDS+PS can reduce the incidence of postoperative bile leakage to a certain extent,which is safe and effective.

郭志唐;龙奎;陈章彬;李伟思;戈佳云

昆明医科大学第二附属医院肝胆胰外科,云南 昆明,650101||怒江州人民医院普通外科昆明医科大学第二附属医院肝胆胰外科,云南 昆明,650101

临床医学

胆总管结石病胆总管探查术腹腔镜检查一期缝合支架Meta分析

CholedocholithiasisCommon bile duct explorationLaparoscopyPrimary sutureStentsMeta-analysis

《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2024 (002)

108-114 / 7

昆明医科大学第二附属医院院内临床研究项目(ynIIT2021013)

10.13499/j.cnki.fqjwkzz.2024.02.108

评论