低碳城市与创新型城市减碳技术选择机制OA北大核心CSTPCD
Carbon reduction technology selection mechanisms for low-carbon cities and innovative cities
低碳城市试点政策与创新型城市试点政策是实现"双碳"目标与促进经济高质量发展的重要政策工具.探究不同试点政策下企业碳减排技术的选择,对节约企业生产成本、提升企业减排成效具有重要的现实意义.基于此,该研究以利润最大化为目标,在碳减排技术只包括源头治理技术和末端处置技术,且不考虑其他外部政策因素冲击的假设条件下,构建基于希克斯中性技术的生产函数,分析三类试点政策下企业的减碳技术选择机制.进一步,基于2000-2019年中国75个试点城市的3 766家企业的面板数据,运用Hansen门槛面板模型,验证了这一技术选择机制的科学性.研究发现,源头治理技术与末端处置技术在不同试点政策中的选择依据是末端处置技术投入占产出的比例.具体而言:①如果这一比例处于(0,0.5)区间,在低碳城市试点政策下,企业选用成本较低的末端处置技术;在创新型城市试点政策下,企业缺乏投入碳减排技术的意愿;在双试点政策下,企业既运用末端处置技术又投入源头治理技术减碳,并且前一技术见效快,投入更多.②如果这一比例处于(0.5,1)区间,此时,末端处置技术成本已经超过产出的50%,那么三类试点政策下的企业均选择成本较低的源头治理技术减碳.③异质性分析结果表明,在生产成本的约束下,非国有企业、老企业和高碳行业的企业缺乏增加减碳技术投入的积极性.因此,各级政府应引导这三类企业进入碳交易市场,并通过政策补贴、高新技术企业孵化以及碳减排源头治理技术推广的方式激发这三类企业低碳技术创新的主动性,最终以最小的碳减排成本实现碳排放总量的下降.
Low-carbon city pilot policy and innovative city pilot policy are important policy tools for realizing the'dual carbon'goals and promoting high-quality economic development.Examining the choice of carbon emission reduction technologies for enterprises un-der different pilot policies is of great practical significance for saving production costs and enhancing the effectiveness of enterprise emission reduction.In light of these factors,taking profit maximization as the goal and under the assumption that carbon reduction tech-nologies include only cleaner technology and treatment technology without considering the impacts of other external policy factors,we constructed a production function based on Hicks-neutral technology to analyze the carbon reduction technology selection mechanism of enterprises under the three types of pilot policies.Furthermore,based on the panel data of 3 766 enterprises in 75 pilot cities in China from 2000 to 2019,the study verified the scientific validity of these technology selection mechanisms by applying the Hansen threshold panel model.It was found that the selection of cleaner technology and treatment technology in different pilot policies was based on the ratio of treatment technology to the outputs.Specifically:① If this ratio was at(0,0.5),under the pilot policy of low-carbon cities,enter-prises would choose the lower cost treatment technology;under the pilot policy of innovative cities,enterprises would lack the willing-ness to invest in carbon reduction technologies;under the'dual-pilot'policy,enterprises reduced carbon emissions by applying both cleaner technology and treatment technology,and they would invest more in the former because it had a quick effect.② If this ratio was at(0.5,1),when the cost of treatment technology exceeded 50%of the output,enterprises under all three types of pilot policies would choose the lower-cost cleaner technology to reduce carbon.③ The results of the heterogeneity analysis showed that under the constraint of production costs,non-state-owned enterprises,old enterprises,and enterprises in high-carbon industries would lack the incentive to increase their investment in carbon reduction technologies.Therefore,governments at all levels should guide these three types of enter-prises to enter the carbon trading market and stimulate the initiative of low-carbon technological innovation of these enterprises through policy subsidies,high-tech enterprise incubation,and the promotion of carbon reduction source-governance technologies,so as to ulti-mately achieve the reduction of total carbon emissions with the smallest carbon emission reduction cost.
万安位;黄永春
河海大学商学院,江苏 南京 211100河海大学商学院,江苏 南京 211100||河海大学社会科学研究院,江苏 南京 211100
经济学
源头治理技术末端处置技术低碳城市试点政策创新型城市试点政策门槛模型
source-governance technologytreatment technologylow-carbon city pilot policyinnovative city pilot policythreshold model
《中国人口·资源与环境》 2024 (002)
23-31 / 9
国家社会科学基金项目"'产-才-城'适配视域下长三角人才一体化发展的协同机制研究"(批准号:21BGL016);江苏高校哲学社会科学研究重大项目"技术型创业团队的成长机制与培育路径研究"(批准号:2021SJZDA027);江苏省知识产权软科学项目"科创板上市公司创新能力分析及培育路径研究"(批准号:JSIP-2021-R-B04).
评论