地诺孕素治疗子宫内膜异位症的快速卫生技术评估OA北大核心CSTPCD
Rapid health technology assessment of dienogest in the treatment of endometriosis
目的:快速评价地诺孕素治疗子宫内膜异位症的有效性、安全性和经济性,旨在为临床药物选择和决策提供循证依据.方法:计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、中国知网、SinoMed、万方数据、国内外卫生技术评估(HTA)机构官方网站及相关数据库,收集地诺孕素治疗子宫内膜异位症的HTA报告、系统评价/Meta分析和药物经济学研究,检索时限均为建库起至2023年9月.资料提取和质量评价后,对纳入研究的结果进行描述性分析.结果:共纳入9篇系统评价(Meta分析)、2篇药物经济学研究.Meta分析文献质量偏低,经济学研究质量较好.有效性方面,与无治疗相比,地诺孕素可以显著降低术后复发率、盆腔疼痛(VAS)评分,提高妊娠率及有效率;地诺孕素与促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)、复方口服避孕药(COC)在复发率方面疗效相当;在复发率、妊娠率方面,地诺孕素优于达那唑,孕三烯酮以及米非司酮.安全性方面,与安慰剂对比,地诺孕素阴道出血、头痛的发生率显著增高,骨质丢失情况无差异;地诺孕素阴道出血发生率显著高于GnRHa,但潮热、骨质丢失的发生率低于GnRHa.经济性方面,与GnRHa比较,地诺孕素更具有成本-效益优势;而与COC比较,地诺孕素不具有经济性.结论:地诺孕素治疗子宫内膜异位症具有良好的有效性和安全性;经济性优于GnRHa,但劣于COC.
AIM:To rapidly evaluate the effective-ness,safety and economy of dienogest in the treat-ment of endometriosis so as to provide evidence-based reference for clinical drug selection and deci-sion.METHODS:Retrieved from PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Library,CNKI,SinoMed,Wanfang and health technology assessment(HTA)organization websites,HTA report,systematic review/Meta-anal-ysis and pharmacoeconomic study were included during the inception to Sep 2023.Data extraction and quality evaluation were carried out for the lit-erature that met the inclusion and exclusion crite-ria,and the research results were summarized and analyzed qualitatively.RESULTS:Nine systematic re-view/Meta-analyses,and 2 pharmacoeconomic studies were included.The quality of Meta-analysis literatures was low,and the quality of economic re-search was good.In terms of effectiveness,com-pared with no treatment,dienogest can significant-ly reduce postoperative recurrence rate,VAS score,and improve pregnancy rate and effective rate;Di-enogest has similar therapeutic effects in terms of recurrence rate as GnRHa and COC;With regard to recurrence rate and pregnancy rate,dienogest is superior to danazol,gestrinone,and mifepristone.In terms of safety,compared with placebo,the inci-dence of vaginal bleeding and headache was signifi-cantly increased with dienogest,and there was no difference in bone loss;The incidence of vaginal bleeding caused by dienogest was significantly high-er than that of GnRHa,but the incidence of hot flashes and bone loss was lower.In terms of econo-my,dienogest has a more cost-effective advantage comparing with GnRHa,but does not have econom-ic benefits comparing with COC.CONCLUSION:Di-enogest has good effectiveness and safety in the treatment of endometriosis,and economically su-perior to GnRHa,but inferior to COC.
郭华;刘兰兰;黄春芝;孙楠;任艳丽
郑州大学第三附属医院,药学部,郑州 450052,河南
临床医学
地诺孕素子宫内膜异位症有效性安全性经济性快速卫生技术评估
dienogestendometriosiseffective-nesssafetyeconomyrapid health technology as-sessment
《中国临床药理学与治疗学》 2024 (005)
512-519 / 8
河南省医学科技攻关计划(联合共建)项目(LHGJ20200463)
评论