|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|肝胆胰外科杂志|LCBDE术中一期缝合与T管引流的术后胆漏发生率比较

LCBDE术中一期缝合与T管引流的术后胆漏发生率比较OACSTPCD

Comparison of the incidence of postoperative bile leakage between primary closure and T-tube drainage in LCBDE

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 比较腹腔镜胆总管探查术中(LCBDE)行一期缝合和T管引流的术后胆漏发生率,并分析术后胆漏的危险因素.方法 回顾性分析2015年1月至2022年11月于温州医科大学附属第一医院行LCBDE的患者资料,分为一期缝合组和T管引流组,采用Logistic多因素回归分别分析两组发生胆漏的危险因素.对两组中有肝内结石、上段胆总管结石、最大结石直径、体温最高值和中性粒细胞百分比5项指标进行倾向性评分匹配(PSM)后,比较两组胆漏发生率.结果 共纳入患者1 052例,其中143例患者发生术后胆漏,发生率为13.5%.Logistic多因素回归分析显示年龄>60岁为一期缝合组(n=506)胆漏的危险因素(OR=2.242,95%CI 1.300-4.038,P=0.005),主刀医师实施LCBDE少于10例为T管引流组(n=546)胆漏的危险因素(OR=3.525,95%CI 1.469-7.996,P=0.003).经PSM成功匹配383对患者,一期缝合组胆漏发生率较T管引流组高[15.1%(58/383)vs 9.9%(38/383),P=0.029].结论 患者年龄>60岁是行LCBDE术中一期缝合后发生胆漏的独立危险因素,医师经验不足(主刀医师实施LCBDE少于10例)是行留置T管后发生胆漏的独立危险因素.相较于一期缝合,留置T管引流可以降低LCBDE术后胆漏的发生率.

Objective To compare the incidence of postoperative bile leakage between primary duct closure and T-tube drainage in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration(LCBDE)and investigate the risk factors of postoperative bile leakage.Methods Clinical data of patients who underwent LCBDE in the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from Jan.2015 to Nov.2022 were retrospectively analyzed.Patients were divided into the primary closure group and the T-tube drainage group.The risk factors of postoperative bile leakage were analyzed by multivariate Logistic regression in the two groups respectively.The incidence of postoperative bile leakage in the two groups was compared by a propensity score matching(PSM)of 5 indicators,including intrahepatic stones,upper common bile duct stones,maximum stone diameter,highest body temperature,and neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio.Results A total of 1 052 patients were included,and 143(13.5%)patients had postoperative bile leakage.Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that age>60 years(OR=2.242,95%CI 1.300-4.038,P=0.005)was a risk factor for bile leakage in the primary suture group(n=506),and the chief surgeon performed less than 10 cases of LCBDE(OR=3.525,95%CI 1.469-7.996,P=0.003)was a risk factor for postoperative bile leakage in the T-tube drainage group(n=546).Three hundred eighty-three pairs of patients were successfully matched after a propensity score matching.The incidence of postoperative bile leakage in the primary suture group was higher than that in the T-tube drainage group[15.1%(58/383)vs 9.9%(38/383),P=0.029].Conclusion Age>60 years is an independent risk factor for bile leakage after primary suture and surgeon's inexperience(the chief surgeon performed less than 10 cases of LCBDE)is an independent risk factor for bile leakage after T-tube drainage.Compared with primary suture,T-tube drainage can reduce the incidence of bile leakage after LCBDE.

陈哲;吕昊阳;黄侠鸣;张启瑜;俞富祥

温州医科大学附属第一医院 肝胆胰外科,浙江 温州 325000

临床医学

胆总管结石胆总管探查术一期缝合T管引流胆漏倾向性评分匹配

choledocholithiasisprimary closurecommon bile duct explorationT-tube drainagebile leakagepropensity score matching

《肝胆胰外科杂志》 2024 (004)

211-217 / 7

10.11952/j.issn.1007-1954.2024.04.004

评论